According to the Palestinians, the proposal, which U.S. and Saudi officials have since disavowed, Israel would keep effectively everything, including full border control, all settlements, and permanent rule over all of Jerusalem
Palestinian officials are voicing major concern following a recent meeting between President Mahmoud Abbas and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, during which the prince set out a shockingly bad set of terms for a new peace proposal being pushed, supposedly with the support of the U.S. government.
According to the Palestinians this proposal, which U.S. and Saudi officials have since disavowed, Israel would keep effectively everything, including full border control, all settlements, and permanent rule over all of Jerusalem. The Palestinians would be given “limited” sovereignty over a few small, non-contiguous parts of the West Bank, but would have to disavow the right of return for all Palestinian refugees around the world even for that.
Such a plan would certainly never be accepted by the Palestinians, but Abbas was reportedly told that this didn’t matter, and the suggestion is that the Saudis believe they can get the rest of the Arab world on board with this.
There are reasons to doubt this beyond just the public denials though, as President Trump has expressed interest in an “ultimate deal” for Israel and Palestine, and even making such a proposal would surely kill the chances of anything like that emerging during his time in office.
The Saudis, however, have been interested in cozying up to Israel for the sake of picking a fight with Iran, and throwing the Palestinians under the bus in the process might not matter that much to them at this point.
With the hypothetical alternate plan still not public, it’s not clear that the reports can be totally dismissed out of hand, even if trying to implement them is almost certain to go nowhere.
Top photo | Donald Trump and Saudi Defense Minister and Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrive for lunch in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, March 14, 2017. (AP/Evan Vcci)
Think about who gets rich off of the Venezuela regime-change agenda. It’s the same people that said we had to invade Iraq in order to prevent nuclear apocalypse. It’s the same people who said the world would stop turning on its axis if we didn’t carpet bomb Libya and Syria.
Watch: From Colombia and Brazil, Kei Pritsker on the decades of US meddling in South America that preceded the ongoing coup in Venezuela.
Kei Pritsker breaks down the nature of US humanitarian aid and how it’s weaponized to advance foreign policy objectives.
Kei Pritsker explains how Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido came to have the backing of US corporations, political interests and ultimately, the Trump administration.
