“Trump may be a threat,” notes journalist Glenn Greenwald, “but so is this covert coup” that seeks to impose its “own ideology with zero democratic accountability, mandate or transparency.”
What’s more troubling: That the grotesque liar and right-wing narcissist Donald Trump was elected by the American people to be President of the United States in 2016? Or that there is now apparently a secret cabal of unelected right-wing officials inside his White House—at least according to a New York Times op-ed published Wednesday afternoon—that is actively undermining his presidency from within and their own discretion?
“I work for the president,” the op-ed writer, controversially provided anonymity by Times, confesses, “but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”
The explosive admission detailed in the column, if true, would be historically unprecedented: someone described by the paper as a confirmed “senior official in the Trump administration” openly admitting to the American public that there is a coordinated effort afoot to sabotage the prerogatives—horrible and offensive as they might be—of the democratically-elected president they have been hired or appointed to serve.
Kaboom! Never seen anything quite like this before. Bombshell NYT anonymous op-ed piece from INSIDE Trump White House. A must read. https://t.co/rLNdUnUoBm
— Dan Rather (@DanRather) September 5, 2018
The individual behind the op-ed is clear that the efforts of those opposing the president “is not the popular ‘resistance’ of the left,” but rather right-wing operatives concerned that Trump’s “amorality”—as they alone define it—is a threat to their perceived notions of what good governance should be.
In response to its publication, Trump called the person responsible “gutless” and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee-Sanders in a statement called on the author to quit immediately.
“The individual behind this piece has chosen to deceive, rather than support, the duly elected President of the United States,” she said in a statement. “He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people.” She added, “This coward should do the right thing and resign.”
Later, in a tweet, Trump called on the Times, citing “National Security purposes”, to “turn him/her over to government at once.”
But while some on the progressive left were championing the anonymous author for taking a brave stance against an “unhinged” president (or the “mad king“), others expressed deep concern about the implications of the op-ed.
To be clear: This isn't #Resistance. This is a right-wing accomplice to Trump's corrupt, morally-bankrupt, bigoted agenda trying to sleep better at night. Quit &work to tear him down, or shut your mouth & accept responsibility for what you've wrought. https://t.co/3b8hBBSgWI
— Democracy for America (@DFAaction) September 5, 2018
In his assessment—in which he called the irony of the op-ed “glaring and massive” and also described the author as a “coward”—journalist Glenn Greenwald pointed out that while “Trump may be a threat” in his own right, “so is this covert coup” that seeks to impose its “own ideology with zero democratic accountability, mandate or transparency.”
Many of the complaints from the NYT's anonymous WH coward – not all, but many – are ideological: that Trump deviates from GOP orthodoxy, an ideology he didn't campaign on & that voters didn't ratify. Trump may be a threat but so is this covert coup to impose these policies. pic.twitter.com/4Qf54JJHN9
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) September 5, 2018
Progressive journalist and media critic Reed F. Richardson agreed with Greenwald’s sentiments and concerns, writing on Twitter, “Proponents of healthy, civilian-rule democracy should not be encouraging or celebrating secret, independent military insubordination as a response to reckless/illegal executive overreach. It sets a precedent that is ripe for abuse.”
I have many problems with this piece, but a Senior Trump official says that Donald Trump is so disturbing and unhinged that many members of the cabinet have openly considered having him removed from the office via the 25th Amendment.
THIS IS A CRISIS.https://t.co/SPDn9SFL76
— Shaun King (@shaunking) September 5, 2018
However, another left-leaning journalist, Jordan Chariton, put it this way: “If senior officials feel the country is in peril, they need to put their name to it and invoke the 25th amendment… [the Times] allowing a senior official to do anonymous op-ed (may not even work in actual White House) is essentially gossip.”
This is as extraordinary as it is outrageous. Extraordinary that 45's senior staff is trying to sink him. Outrageous that they got on board to begin with and that they actually think that their cruel, heartless policies are a source of pride. https://t.co/AIHPLDNYOj
— Vince Warren (@VinceWarren) September 5, 2018
And finally, as political activist and writer Ben Spielberg explained about why so-called “Never Trump” Republicans—like the author of the op-ed appears to be— should simply not to be trusted. “An enemy of your enemy is not always your friend,” warned Spielberg. “This is something everyone who considers themselves part of the #Resistance would do well to remember.”
Top Photo | President Donald Trump looks towards Norway’s Prime Minister Erna Solberg as she speaks during a news conference in the East Room of the White House, Jan. 10, 2018. (AP/Carolyn Kaster)
Common Dreams is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.
Mnar Muhawesh speaks with journalist Daniel McAdams about being permanently banned from Twitter, social media censorship and more.
As millions gather in Santiago and whole families march against privatization and rising inequality, the corporate media is busy defending Chile’s billionaire president.
An interview with anti-war campaigner Cindy Sheehan on how liberals learned to love her, her clash with the Women’s March and more.
It is inconceivable to the United States that a “rag-tag” force like Yemen’s Houthis might, with home-made weapons, outdo the hundred-billion-dollar might and sophistication of the state-of-the-art systems Washington has lavished upon the Saudis.
