UPDATE: Small Colorado Town Mulls Putting Bounty On Drones In Its Skies

The Deer Trail, Colo. resident who drafted the ordinance said that the proposal is largely symbolic.
By |
Be Sociable, Share!
    • Google+
    Deer Trail Mayor Franks Fields aims a shotgun at the sky above Deer Field, Colo., to demonstrate how he imagines residents shooting down drones. (Photo/screen grab via YouTube)

    Deer Trail Mayor Franks Fields aims a shotgun at the sky above Deer Field, Colo., to demonstrate how he imagines residents shooting down drones. (Photo/screen grab via YouTube)

    UPDATE: After news broke that Deer Trail, Colo., was considering a $100 bounty to residents if they could shoot down a drone, the Federal Aviation Administration warned doing so could result in prosecution and fines.

    In a statement, the FAA said that a drone “hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air,”  and that “[s]hooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane.”

    Responding to the FAA’s statement, Phillip Steel, the Deer Trail resident who drafted the ordinance, said, “The FAA doesn’t have the power to make a law.”


    Original story:

    The small town of Deer Trail, Colo., is considering a dramatic approach to showcase their discontent for the use of drones — offering bounties to residents if they can successfully shoot down an unmanned aerial vehicle.

    Located 55 miles east of Denver, the town of 540 residents has proposed the following ordinance:

    “The Town of Deer Trail shall issue a reward of $100 to any shooter who presents a valid hunting license and the following identifiable parts of an unmanned aerial vehicle whose markings and configuration are consistent with those used on any similar craft known to be owned or operated by the United States federal government.”

    While the legal ramifications for issuing licenses to citizens to target federal property are unclear right now, the act of damaging or destroying government property is a federal crime.

    Although the federal government’s rules about drone damage are not considered in the the ordinance, the legislation does set some guidelines for proper drone-hunting protocol.

    Drone hunters would need to be at least 21 years old, must be capable of reading and understanding English, and would only be able to use “any shotgun, 12 gauge or smaller, having a barrel length of 18 inches or greater.”

    The $25 licenses would be issued anonymously and a background check would not be required.

    Phillip Steel, the Deer Trail resident who drafted the ordinance, said that while the proposal is largely symbolic, he hopes the government takes it seriously.

    Though Steel told a local ABC news station he has never seen a drone flying over the town, he does not “believe in the idea of a surveillance society, and I believe we are heading that way,” he said. “We do not want drones in town. They fly in town, they get shot down.”

    Deer Trail Mayor Franks Fields says he isn’t sure yet how he feels about the potential drone hunting legislation, but said it could be a good economic boost for the town.

    “I haven’t made my decision yet. It’s all novelty. Do a little drone fest, get people to come out, have fun,” he said.

    Kim Oldfield, the town clerk, agrees. She said that because of the novelty of the ordinance, the town may be able to benefit monetarily by hosting drone hunt festivals.

    “We’re the home of the world’s first rodeo, so we could home of the world’s first drone hunt,” she said.

    Since the drone hunting permits don’t appear to be limited to just Deer Field residents, some suspect that many people across the U.S. will purchase a permit just for the novelty of owning a drone hunting license.

    While some have expressed concern that the drone hunt ordinance may create a local vigilante movement, Oldfield says that likely won’t happen.

    “If they were to read it for the title alone and not for the novelty and what it really is, it sounds scary, and it sounds super vigilante and frightening,” he told ABC 7 News. “The real idea behind it is it’s a potential fun, moneymaker, and it could be really cool for our community and we’ve needed something to bring us together, and this could be it.”

    Another concern is the safety of the town’s residents. Since federal policy prohibits the U.S. government from using armed drones to kill American citizens in the U.S., some observers have expressed concern that the bigger danger may be errant anti-drone fire.

    “These bullets go a long way up when they’re fired,” says ballistics expert David Dyson. “But you don’t know where they’re going to land — there’s always a chance of them causing serious harm or death.”

    The town’s seven-member board is scheduled to consider the ordinance on August 6.

    Be Sociable, Share!

    Stories published in our Hot Topics section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Mint Press News editorial policy.


    Print This Story Print This Story
    You Might Also Like  
    This entry was posted in Daily Digest, National and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
    • Mexoplex

      stupid HeeHaws, always wanting to shoot something. Then when a 200 lbs agriculture drone falls onto one of your trailer homes and sets it on fire, you want to sue somebody. Honestly, how can you tell a “good” drone vs a “bad” one? Or somebody shoots low at a drone and hits somebody kid? But it will be the drone’s owner at fault?
      And more than half of you worried about ‘privacy’ don’t have anything anybody cares about. unless its your meth lab or youre committing fraud on a worker’s comp claim.

    • kevin_hunt

      Where do I sign up?

    • Pingback: Small Colorado Town Mulls Putting Bounty On Drones In Its Skies – Mintpress News | Easy Best Loan()

    • David Walker

      Let the good times roll ! License fees should be used to fund the reward, so that it is more than $100. If 100 people bought licenses at $25 a pop, the reward would be $2500. Once a big reward was handed out, more people would buy licenses. You could cap the reward at a certain level, so that the kitty would keep accumulating and paying out.

      But beyond the financial logistics, the message the program would send is of great importance. Phillip Steel is absolutely correct that we are living in a surveillance society, and that our American freedoms have been traded, not for security, but for the illusion of security. If Deer Trail were to do this, it would send a strong message not just to the government, but to the American people : “We are not OK with the government spying on us”.

      As for ballistics expert David Dyson, I think he is talking about rifle bullets, not shotgun pellets. Shotguns have a pretty short range – anyone shooting would easily be able to see the area the shot would fall into. Obviously you would not want to shoot in town, or near houses or areas where kids were playing, etc. Most gun owners who regularly shoot are pretty responsible people, but I’m sure there would have to be some limits set to keep idiots from causing mayhem.

      Where do I apply for my license ?

    • Pingback: Newest Direct Flights From Buffalo News()

    • Pingback: Small Colorado Town Mulls Putting Bounty On Drones In Its Skies | Wireless Sensors()