Rejecting major telecom company’s offer to voluntarily expand in rural regions, UK government says speedy broadband service now mandatory nationwide by 2020.
While last week the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rolled back net neutrality rules that allowed the internet to be regulated as a public utility, the United Kingdom announced Wednesday that by 2020, high-speed internet will be a legal right for all British households and businesses.
Rejecting an offer from the British communications company BT to voluntarily provide universal broadband access and improve speeds in rural regions on their own timeline, the U.K. Department of Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport has adopted a universal service obligation (USO) stipulating that by 2020, speeds of at least 10Mbps—or what’s “needed to meet the requirements of an average family”—must be available nationwide.
The department told the Guardian that officials felt BT’s proposal was not “strong enough for us to take the regulatory USO off the table, and have therefore decided not to pursue BT’s proposal, in favor of providing a legal right to broadband.”
“We are grateful to BT for their proposal but have decided that only a regulatory approach will make high speed broadband a reality for everyone in the U.K., regardless of where they live or work,” said Culture Secretary Karen Bradley. “We know how important broadband is to homes and businesses and we want everyone to benefit from a fast and reliable connection.”
In a statement, the department outlines the consumer benefits to a regulatory approach:
Digital Minister Matt Hancock explained on BBC Radio 4 that the right to access high-speed internet does not mean it will be delivered automatically to all households, but rather that “it’s about having the right to demand it,” so “if you don’t go on the internet and aren’t interested then you won’t phone up and demand this.”
The decision comes less than a week after a report from Ofcom, the U.K.’s communications regulator, revealed that four percent of homes, or over a million households, do not have access to broadband speeds of at least 10Mbps. The report showed that speeds were notably worse in rural areas.
While the U.K. is now on a path to provide all residents with access to high-speed internet over the new few years, last week federal regulators in the United States voted to terminaterules that barred internet service providers (ISPs) from creating “fast lanes,” and slowing or blocking access to certain websites.
As news of the U.K. decision broke Wednesday, advocates for net neutrality started comparing the two governments’ priorities, with not only internet access, but also topics including healthcare and transportation:
France is banning fossil fuel production & the UK just announced it’s making high-speed internet a right.
It’s like the rest of the world is looking at the US & going, “Let’s do the exact opposite of THAT.”
What’s next? Universal health care?
Oh. Wait.
— Tarina Deaton (@tarinadeaton) December 20, 2017
After US kills net neutrality — UK decides high-speed internet is a legal right of all citizens https://t.co/CRzPz49lJd As we watch the US slide backwards into the land of corporate greed, the world walks by us without looking back.
Hi speed rail anyone? Wrong country for that— Shiva (@shivabeach) December 20, 2017
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
It is inconceivable to the United States that a “rag-tag” force like Yemen’s Houthis might, with home-made weapons, outdo the hundred-billion-dollar might and sophistication of the state-of-the-art systems Washington has lavished upon the Saudis.
The West has more to do with the Hong Kong protest movement than it would like us to know. It’s the ugly face of Washington’s long-standing foreign policy directed at destabilizing one of its long-standing economic foes: China.
The same media that has spent years dragging Assange’s name through the mud is now engaging in a blackout on his treatment. If you are waiting for corporate media pundits to defend freedom of the press, you’re going to be disappointed.
Think about who gets rich off of the Venezuela regime-change agenda. It’s the same people that said we had to invade Iraq in order to prevent nuclear apocalypse. It’s the same people who said the world would stop turning on its axis if we didn’t carpet bomb Libya and Syria.
