• Support MPN
Logo Logo
  • Investigations
  • Cartoons
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Language
    • 中文
    • русский
    • Español
    • Français
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
  • Support MPN
  • Support BTH
  • Download Our App
  • Support MPN
Protesters stage a rally to oppose a plan to deploy an advanced U.S. missile defense system called Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, in Seongju, where the THAAD will be deployed, South Korea, March 18, 2017. (AP/Ahn Young-joon)

South Korea Rejects Trump’s Demand To Pay For US Missile Defense

Follow Us

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Rumble
  • Odysee
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
Protesters stage a rally to oppose a plan to deploy an advanced U.S. missile defense system called Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, in Seongju, where the THAAD will be deployed, South Korea, March 18, 2017. (AP/Ahn Young-joon)
Protesters stage a rally to oppose a plan to deploy an advanced U.S. missile defense system called Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, in Seongju, where the THAAD will be deployed, South Korea, March 18, 2017. (AP/Ahn Young-joon)

President Trump has repeatedly made clear that he likes the idea of getting other countries to pay for US military operations that benefit them, and that showed up today in the ongoing buildup on the Korean Peninsula, with Trump talking up how incredible the THAAD missile defense system is, and that it “would be appropriate” for South Korea to pay for the billion dollar system’s deployment.

South Korea didn’t like that idea too much, and since the THAAD deployment is subject to an actual agreement, they were quick to point out that the agreement required them to provide a site and infrastructure for the deployment, while the US paid for deployment and operation.

The THAAD is intended to protect targets in the area around Korea from North Korean missiles, though its effectiveness in actual situations is seen by most experts as extremely limited, and it would be of little use if the US did launch a full-scale war against North Korea, as most retaliation would be artillery, not missiles.

Trump’s notion that he might be about to get South Korea to pay for the costly system is the latest in a string of such notions that has come very much after the fact, with the US already having agreements in place that don’t oblige the other nation to offer them any sort of payment,, and no real reason for anyone to expect that they’d suddenly offer to do so just because Trump suggested it would be “appropriate” of them to offer.


 © Antiwar.com

 

Comments
April 29th, 2017
Jason Ditz

What’s Hot

Project INVICTUS: Inside the UK’s Human Rights Busting Campaign to Spy on Refugees

John Pilger: From Yellow Journalism to China Bashing, the Media’s Enduring Role in Promoting War

TikTok: Chinese “Trojan Horse” Is Run by State Department Officials

Why the Media Don’t Want to Know the Truth About the Nord Stream Blasts 

As UK Inks Trade Deal with Israel, Rishi Sunak’s Connections to Apartheid State Come Under Scrutiny

 
  • Contact Us
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2023 MintPress News