Palestine To Revoke Recognition Of Israel If US Moves Embassy To Jerusalem

The Palestinian call to action and warning to Trump came a week after the new U.S. Congress introduced a bill to move the country’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
By |
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Reddit
    • Google+
    Palestinian

    Debris of a Palestinian building demolished by Israeli forces in annexed East Jerusalem on December 01, 2014. (Photo: Anadolu/Salih Zeki Fazlıoğlu)

    (REPORT) — Palestinian leaders Tuesday called for prayers at mosques across the Middle East this week to protest plans by President-elect Donald Trump to move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and also threatened to withdraw the Palestinian recognition of Israel if the move is realized.

    Mohammad Shtayyeh, a senior Palestinian official and Fatah central committee member who spoke on behalf of the Palestinian leadership, said moving the U.S. embassy would mean an “end to the two-state solution.”

    “I think and we all think that moving the embassy to Jerusalem is a dangerous step that will have dangerous consequences for the political track for our people and for our future aspirations and for the Muslim, Arab, Christian countries and people all over the world,” Shtayyeh told journalists in the West Bank city of Ramallah.


    Advertisment

    As a protest against such a move, Shtayyeh called for prayers at mosques throughout the Middle East Friday as well as for churches to ring bells in protest Sunday. “We are not inciting violence. Ringing a church bell … is not a violent act. Calling for a prayer is not a violent act.”

    He said the Palestinian leadership had been informed by diplomatic contacts that Trump could call for the move in his inauguration speech on Jan. 20. The senior official warned that if the move goes through, the Palestinian Liberation Organization would consider whether to withdraw recognition of Israel.

    The Palestinian call to action and warning to Trump came a week after the new U.S. Congress introduced a bill to move the country’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, calling on Washington to recognize Jerusalem as “the undivided capital of the State of Israel.”

    The “Jerusalem Embassy and Recognition Act,” submitted last Tuesday by three senators, including former Republican presidential candidates and senators Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida, would withhold funds from the U.S. state department until the embassy is moved.

    There have been warnings that moving the U.S. embassy to the contested city and recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital could inflame tensions in the Middle East and possibly sink what remains of peace efforts.

    Recognizing the highly-contested city as the Israeli capital would be a controversial move given Israel’s illegal occupation of East Jerusalem since 1967 and its later annexation of East Jerusalem in a move never recognized by the international community.

    The Palestinians regard Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem as the capital of their future state, while Israel proclaims the entire city as its capital.

    Jerusalem is home to sites sacred to Jews, Muslims and Christians and the move would be a break from decades of U.S. policy. Successive administrations have refused calls to move the embassy, arguing that its status should be resolved as part of peace negotiations.

    Trump has already made clear that he would side with the far-right factions of the Israeli political sphere. He slammed the Obama administration for failing to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution passed on Dec. 23 calling for a cessation to Israeli settlement building in Palestinian territory.

    Trump has also nominated David Friedman, a supporter of Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank, as his ambassador to Tel Aviv.


    © teleSUR

    Be Sociable, Share!

      Stories published in our Hot Topics section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Mint Press News editorial policy.

       

      Print This Story Print This Story
      You Might Also Like  
      ___________________________________________
      This entry was posted in Daily Digest, Foreign Affairs and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
      • Helen4Yemen
        • TecumsehUnfaced

          Funny, I really can’t see Mike Pence as a Christian, more like a Schutzstaffel.

          • Helen4Yemen

            “Schutzstaffel” – never seen the word before but I was able to guess right – it made me laugh …

            • TecumsehUnfaced

              From the first time I saw his picture, I had visions of him wearing a black military uniform and barking orders to a firing squad.

              Oh, thanks for cluing me on that article, Why I am an Anti-Zionist Jew. It was excellent, and the comments were excellent too, while squeakywheel played comedy relief and straight man.

      • Helen4Yemen

        https://i1.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/dna-dershowitz.png?ssl=1&w=900

        How can one ‘return’ to a place where one has 0% ancestry?

        Do you that Asia is highlighted in orange color because he has 0.1% ancestry?

        Do you that Africa is highlighted in pink color to indicate a trace of less than 0.1% ancestry?

        Do you see that the Middle East is totally in white color to indicate no trace of ancestry?

      • Helen4Yemen
      • Pingback: Embassy Move to Jerusalem | But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it. (Matt 7:14)()

      • Basiclife1

        Trump… Causing wars for political gain.

      • TecumsehUnfaced

        These thugs have the financial and military power behind them to despoil whomever they want. Today Palestine, tomorrow the World! Such is the ambition of these thugs unencumbered by conscience,

        • Helen4Yemen
          • TecumsehUnfaced

            Very nice! I’ve copied it.

            • Helen4Yemen

              You and I once discussed why they do not have charts where they show Muslim, Christian, Jew separately. Almost all of them have two categories: Jew and non-Jew. I much prefer the ones that show the Christians as a separate group. They are extremely rare.

            • Jack

              TecumsehUnfaced – who are you trying to fool, everyone already knows that you are the Siamese twin of Helen4Yemen, you are sharing the same 60 IQ brain.

              • TecumsehUnfaced

                Attaboy! Show everything the humor of the ZioNazi thugs!

                • Jack

                  TecumsehUnfaced – you and your Siamese twin of Helen4Yemen games all over the internet are well known, while you endorse the Houthi killers that kill thousands of innocent civilians in Yemen.

                  • TecumsehUnfaced

                    Not true, but you endorse the ZioNazi and Saudi thugs, the two biggest killers in the Middle East.

                    • Jack

                      TecumsehUnfaced

                      I DESPISE both the Saudi and your Huthi Hero’s who share the same religion and who kill innocent civilians, while you and your Siamese twin of Helen4Yeme endorse your Huthi Hero’s killers

                      IGNORANT READ REGARDING YOUR HUTHI HERO KILLERS..

                      The Huthi armed group and allied forces have endangered the lives of thousands of civilians in the southern city of Ta’iz by blocking the entry of crucial medical supplies and food in recent months. Most of the city’s hospitals were forced to shut down, and the few that remain open have been on the verge of collapse due to a lack of supplies.

                      Women and girls remained subject to discrimination and abuses including forced marriage and female genital mutilation. Courts handed down death sentences and executions were carried out.

                      The Huthi armed group and their allies laid internationally banned anti-personnel landmines that caused civilian casualties; dozens of civilians were killed or injured by landmines when returning to their homes in the second half of the year after fighting ended in Aden and the surrounding area.

                      Huthis and their allies carried out cross-border attacks from northern Yemen that could amount to war crimes, indiscriminately shelling Najran and other civilian-populated areas in southern Saudi Arabia.

                      Huthis and their allied forces used live ammunition to fire at peaceful protesters on 16 February, wounding three protesters, and on 21 February, killing protester Nasr al-Shuja’.

                      In Ta’iz, the pro-Huthi Central Security Forces used excessive force, including tear gas and live fire, to disperse peaceful demonstrations from 22 to 25 March, killing at least eight protesters and wounding at least 30 others. Almost 300 protesters and bystanders required treatment for tear gas inhalation.

                      In Sana’a, Huthis and their allied forces detained three protesters on 11 February and tortured them over the following four days; one, Salah ‘Awdh al-Bashri, died from injuries he sustained during hours of torture.

      • Kagey1

        The capture of the Old City of Jerusalem in a defensive war against Jordan was not illegal. The final borders between Israel and the yet to be born Palestinian state are to be decided in negotiations that will set the borders. In the 1947 partition plan, Jerusalem was supposed to be an international city with neither Israel nor the Palestinian state to have sovereignty over it. The Palestinian Muslims rejected and attacked Israel, with Jordan gaining sovereignty over Jerusalem and making it Judenrein for the first time in almost 2,000 years. When it did so it razed all the but one of the 35 synagogues there and also desecrated the centuries old Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives. Israel has now exercised sovereignty over it and has repeatedly agreed to sit down with the Palestinian authority without preconditions. That perforce includes including the Old City of Jerusalem in the negotiations. Of course, that means the Palestinian Authority must do the same.

        • TecumsehUnfaced

          Liar! You savage European thugs invaded Palestine with the intent of genocidal country stealing. You are nothing but a bunch of international rogues of no detectable conscience.

          • Kagey1

            Again you change the topic. Reply about Jerusalem

            • TecumsehUnfaced

              Wow! You can’t see that I’ve already replied by demonstrating that your silly question mendaciously ducks the real question of what right do the foreign European Ashkenazi thugs have to be in Palestine.

              Remember, before the arrival of the predatory European Zionists in Palestine, the Arab Jews, Christians, and Muslims lived together much more peaceably than the Europeans. The misery of the Arab Jews is entirely the fault of the genocidal country stealing of the European savages.

            • TecumsehUnfaced

              Kagey1, why are you European genocidal country stealers in Palestine? I made over a dozen requests from you, yet you say nothing. Are you afraid to keep lying?

              • Kagey1

                You still refuse to answer the question of why the definition of a Palestinian refugee was changed from ‘a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence’ to one who was in Mandatory Palestine since 1946. The only reason I can come with was to include recently arrived migrants in the definition. When you either agree with me or propose another answer I will respond to your continuing attempt to change the topic.

                • TecumsehUnfaced


                  It was David Ben Gurion who ordered the slaughter of thousands of
                  Palestinians, both Christians and Muslims, with a plan to ‘empty the
                  holy land of Goyim’. This scheme was called ‘Plan Dalet’ as described by
                  Prof. Illan Pappe in his book ‘The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine’.
                  Illan Pappe was an Israeli Jew who had to flee for his life after he
                  wrote this book. He exposes the grave crimes against humanity that Ben
                  Gurion and the rest of the Zionists had committed.

                  Ben Gurion was a hard core Jewish Zionist – which in current terminology
                  means he was an out and out racist. For crimes no less serious than
                  this, Slobodan Milosevic and the perpetrators of the Rwanda massacres
                  were charged in The Hague for crimes against humanity.

                  Like all racists he wanted an exclusive Jewish state based on the principles
                  that were worse than what was found in apartheid South Africa. To
                  achieve this objective he had to expel the Arabs and he had no
                  compunctions about his evil designs. ‘We must use terror’ he thundered
                  to his Jewish gang of terrorist like the Irgun, Haggana and Stern Gang,
                  ‘assassinations, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all
                  social services to rid the Galille of its Arab population’. And your
                  correspondent Uditha Kumarasinghe, who as he says, has just returned
                  from a visit to Israel, undoubtedly a very enjoyable one, tells us there
                  is a photo of Mahatma Gandhi in Ben Gurion’s bedroom in a futile
                  attempt to convince us that he (Gurion) was a wonderful human being.
                  Hinting at even a comparison between the two is an act of irreverence to
                  the great Indian leader.

                  http://hameed247.blogspot.com/2011/06/true-picture-of-ben-gurion.html

                  • Kagey1

                    You just don’t have an answer do you? That is why you refuse to give an answer to why they changed the definition of refugee for Palestinian Arabs from a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence to someone who was in Mandatory Palestine from 1946. My proposed answer is to include all those recently arrived migrants. What is yours? When you give an answer we can move on.

                    • TecumsehUnfaced

                      I don’t mind you being stuck in the middle of stupidity. Stay there as long as you like. Again I expose the silliness of your question.

                      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Bamk2j86cNE/UeIXy7xXulI/AAAAAAAAATQ/f4zoap_gIUc/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-07-14+at+1.20.39+PM.png

                      • Kagey1

                        Again if that is true why did they change the definition of a refugee? Why wasn’t the definition of a refugee as a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence to one which defined as a refugee anyone who was in Mandatory Palestine as of 1946? If your figures are correct there was no reason to do this. The only reason to do this is if there were many recent migrants they wanted to include. All I ask is for you to give me an alternative reason. You have not done so yet.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          You can’t prove the figures wrong, eh?

                        • Kagey1

                          You still don’t answer why if the figures are correct, the definition of a Palestinian refugee was changed from a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence to one which defined as a refugee anyone who was in Mandatory Palestine as of 1946? You still refuse to answer that simple question.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Thanks! by hammering on this non-issue, you’ve proven the bankruptcy of justification for the cause of ZioNazi genocidal country stealing. You don’t even have any Middle east ancestry. You have been trapped as a total fraud.

                        • Kagey1

                          I have told you I will respond to your questions after you first respond to mine. You keep changing the topic. Respond first then start your diatribe.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          “Diatribe”? Oh my! I’ve been accused of a diatribe by a ZioNazi troll, who can’t justify the savage, evil invasion of Palestine by the European ZioNazi thugs.

                          —————

                          Israeli Historian: Palestinians Are Biological Descendants of Bible’s Jews
                          Israel/PalestineUS Politics Philip Weiss on September 2, 2008 33 Comments

                          Two new articles deal with political/genetic controversies over the origins of “the Jewish people” (of whom I consider myself a part for one tribal reason or another). Here is Israeli historian Schlomo Sand in Le Monde Diplomatique, writing, “Israel Deliberately Forgets Its History.” Sand says that the Jewish exile of 70 AD is a myth, and “the Jews” of Europe were created by conversion.

                          Then there is the question of the exile of 70 AD. There has been no real research into this turning point in Jewish history, the cause of the diaspora. And for a simple reason: the Romans never exiled any nation from anywhere on the eastern seaboard of the Mediterranean…

                          But if there was no exile after 70 AD, where did all the Jews who have populated the Mediterranean since antiquity come from? The smokescreen of national historiography hides an astonishing reality. From the Maccabean revolt of the mid-2nd century BC to the Bar Kokhba revolt of the 2nd century AD, Judaism was the most actively proselytising religion…

                          The most significant mass conversion occurred in the 8th century, in the massive Khazar kingdom between the Black and Caspian seas. The expansion of Judaism from the Caucasus into modern Ukraine created a multiplicity of communities, many of which retreated from the 13th century Mongol invasions into eastern Europe. There, with Jews from the Slavic lands to the south and from what is now modern Germany, they formed the basis of Yiddish culture…
                          http://mondoweiss.net/2008/09/israeli-historian-palestinians-are-biological-descendants-of-bibles-jews/

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Kagey1, why are you European genocidal country stealers of no Semite ancestry in Palestine? I keep asking you that, but you are totally unable to give a simple answer to a simple question.

                        • Kagey1

                          I keep telling you I will respond when you answer my question as to why they changed the definition of a Palestinian refugee was changed from a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence to one which defined as a refugee anyone who was in Mandatory Palestine as of 1946? You are the one who first refused to answer and keep trying to change the subject. I will go on to the new issues when you respond to this one.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          You can’t respond. You’re an idiot defending yourself from the fact that you have no ancestry in Palestine with an idiot question already refuted.

                          Ashkenazi Jews descended from ancient Turkey: New research 22 April 2016
                          Dr Eran Elhaik of the University of Sheffield used a computer modelling system to convert Ashkenazi Jewish DNA – the Jewish communities historically located in Europe – data into geographical information, which revealed that 90 percent of Ashkenazi Jews descend from the Greeks, Iranians and others who colonised northern Anatolia (now northern Turkey) more than 2,000 years ago before converting to Judaism.

                          Dr Elhaik said he believed that that three still-surviving Turkish villages – Iskenaz, Eskenaz and Ashanaz – located in north-eastern Turkey made up part of the original Ashkenazi homeland and formed the nucleus that developed the modern Jewish language of Yiddish.

                          http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/03/03/gbe.evw046.full.pdf+html

                          http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/most-jews-descended-ancient-turkey-new-study-2107639949

                        • Kagey1

                          i can respond but I won’t do it until you first respond to my simple question. Why did they change the definition of a Palestinian refugee from a person who has left, or who is outside of, his country of nationality or of former habitual residence to one which defined as a refugee anyone who was in Mandatory Palestine as of 1946 unless it was to include many recent immigrants who otherwise wouldn’t qualify? Do you have another reason? If so give it. You keep evading the question by trying to change the subject.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Truman’s many diaries are very favorable towards Jews. But those diaries were written for public consumption and with the election to the Presidency in mind which would be impossible without Jewish money and power. But this diary was found two years ago and it was never intended to be public. Truman just wrote what he truly believed and he expressed his frustrations.

                          ——————————

                          [The entry for this day is written on three loose pages, interleaved in the diary book.]

                          6:00 P. M. Monday July 21, 1947

                          Had ten minutes conversation with Henry Morgenthau about Jewish ship in Palistine [sic]. Told him I would talk to Gen[eral] Marshall about it.
                          He’d no business, whatever to call me. The Jews have no sense of proportion nor do they have any judgement on world affairs.

                          Henry brought a thousand Jews to New York on a supposedly temporary basis and they stayed. When the country went backward-and Republican in the election of 1946, this incident loomed large on the D[isplaced] P[ersons] program.

                          The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I’ve found very, very few who remember their past condition when prosperity comes.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          I don’t believe you! You are a confirmed liar. You can’t defend the evil barbarian European ZioNazi thugs’ genocidal invasion of Palestine.

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Kagey1: “You just don’t have an answer do you? That is why you refuse to give an answer”
                        ___
                        He started asking this question over and over again out of topic. It came out of nowhere. The reason is very simple: it is in reaction to the DNA data that shows that the Ashkenazi are 99.9% European. That scares the most. Therefore, he was told by his hasbara agents to do what he is doing to distract. I will respond to any ‘returning’ claim that he used to do very frequently but has now stopped due to the exposure of their lies by DNA.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          He doesn’t understand that hammering this non-issue just shows the bankruptcy of his apologies for Zionism.

                          Poor guy! He suffers from an overload of the mental aberration required to be a Zionist. A kinder world would have committed him a long time ago.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          I would have enjoyed commenting on this article – but I am a day late – oh well – would have been fun to watch so many of them deflate when I introduce the DNA charts. Btw: it is interesting that I no longer go looking for those genetic diseases or side-by-side images. They lost their value once I came upon the DNA stuff.

                          https://disqus.com/home/discussion/spectator-new-blogs/jared_kushners_israel_connection_will_delight_benjamin_netanyahu/

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          I’m stirring up things with a few comments. Their responses may tempt you to re-enter the thread.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          I think you and I would have enjoyed it had we arrived there on time – oh well

                          I was shocked to receive a response from a UnitedwithIsrael article – I thought I had cleaned up and deleted them all yesterday – guess not.

                          https://disqus.com/home/discussion/unitedwithisrael/turkish_president_compares_israelis_to_nazis_despite_reconciliation_85/#comment-3096390521

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          I see you’ve left a lot of comments. Give them time. They may still respond.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          But it is not fun when it becomes like email, I like it when you can do exchanges in real time and be done with it.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          You notice that I have not sent you link for a while now where commenting is going on because there have been no articles on the blogs I follow on Palestine – kind of weird.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Maybe reporters are focusing on the nomination hearings. As far I can see, they are turning out to be something of disappointment, in spite of editors embellishing them with exaggerated headlines.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          This websites does have a few interesting articles but hardly anyone commenting.

                          Also notice the number of Jews who contribute articles

                          http://mwcnews.net/focus/politics/63209-plot-against-britain.html

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Yes, have you tried doing a search on “Shai Masot”?

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          What kind of a people would abandon their names and come up with 4 or 5 letter first and last names? What kind of name “Shai Masot”? They say they now have Hebrew names. Who stopped them before. In the West, they are known to change their last names to first names: Kirk Douglas, Woody Allen, Jon Stewart. What a weird people. Arabic, Latin, Chinese, Irish and so on are known by their last names. How can anyone know who is a Jew from the West is when they have abandoned their Goldberg and Bloomberg names?

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          The only other people I’ve seen do such name changing are criminals piling up aliases under which to hide. The Arab Jews don’t do that, do they?

                          Note that the Rothschild were once Bauer (farmer in German). I suspect that Mayer Amschel Bauer had reason other than those biographically expressed for changing his name.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          No, the Arab Jews had the same names as Muslims: Muhammad , Abdullah, Hussein, Ali … Remember that the Prophet’s name was Muhammad Abdullah before there was Islam, therefore the reason why the Jews and Christians of the ME were also had these same names – they are not “Islamic names”. Arab Jews cannot even attempt to pronounce the Ashkenazi names. But since arriving in Palestine, their Arabic names of many centuries were frowned upon and they no longer have them.

                          I posted the comment below and I begun to laugh – because I can just imagine the shock – the person is going to be gripped was horror- maybe even a heart attack.

                          http://disq.us/p/1f7qkuo

            • Basiclife1

              It’s a city that far too many people care too much about. Personally, I think we should nuke it and be done,

              • Kagey1

                You are entitled to your opinion. Which other cities should we nuke since many people care about many cities?

                • Basiclife1

                  I think we can afford to be fairly restrained with a sensible cutoff, even if we don’t limit ourselves to cities…

                  How about utterly destroying anything that is fought over for more than 100 years. Failing that, total casualties on both sides over 100,000? Although, if we chose the latter standard, Jerusalem should’ve been gone by 614CE, so perhaps we should give a little more leeway.

                  Clearly some people are incapable of sharing and if they’re going to act like petulant infants, they should have their toys taken away.

                  • Kagey1

                    Then you should include Aleppo and Damascus. The Israelis have shown themselves capable of sharing. When the Palestinian Muslims captured the city they made it Judenrein, impossible for Jews to worship and hard for Christians. Since the Jewish state captured it in 1967, there has been freedom of worship for all. I guess that means you think the Jews should stay in control since they know how to and do share.

                    • Basiclife1

                      Seems fair… next time someone goes to war over either of them, do it.

                      Re: Israel’s actions… Please don’t start with justifications and excuses. Stealing land is stealing land. putting a nice face on it afterwards doesn’t make it okay. That’s doubly true when it’s accompanied by an ongoing campaign of violence, humiliation, and collective punishment.

                      Israel is more interested in looking good than in doing anything to improve the situation. Just compare how much money is being spent on Hasbara and political influence vs resolving the conflict.

                      So, let’s not get bogged down in the same old lines. It was a whimsical discussion to prove a point and I still don’t rhink you’ve given me a good reason why we shouldn’t do it.

                      Going on history to date, the number of lives saved would be significant, even if you didn’t evacuate first. Sure, all religions wold be up in arms but they’d be on the same side for the first time in… How long?

                      If we could all move on from this bronze-age religious pissing contest, the world would be a much happier place.

                      • Kagey1

                        As to nuking Jerusalem. what gives you the right to do that. If you want to take the position that everything fought over for more than 100 years or 100,000 deaths should be nuked, then just about every land mass on earth fits in that category. If you believe all humanity should be wiped out on that basis, that is an opinion. Of course, you should also be included in that destructopm unless you come from someplace that wasn’t fought over. Some very isolated South Pacific islands come to mind. Are you from them?

                        • Basiclife1

                          Nobody said anything about not evacuating people first… Plus, I’m not saying we have to nuke the whole planet, just the bits that petulant infants are unable to share.

                        • Kagey1

                          By your standards just about every place in the US, Europe, Asia and Africa should be destroyed since they have been fought over for the last hundred years or so (give or take 50 years). That leaves some parts of Central and South America, Austrailia, New Zealand, maybe some parts of Siberia, and Greenland or Iceland. Which places did I leave out?

                        • Basiclife1

                          I defy you to find me even one city (or similarly-sized location) that has had 100 years of war (cumulatively) on each of the continents listed*.

                          * Ok, you might have a point if we go back to ~1400BC with warring city states, but if we limit ourselves to the time period after the invention of the chariot, I think I’m on solid ground.

                        • Kagey1

                          Cairo, Damascus, Costantinople. I cannot come up with one in Africa, other than Cairo,and I am not sure if you consider Constantinople part of Asia or Europe. But we get away from the point. The only group that has allowed the peaceful sharing of Jerusalem are the Jews in the 20th and 21st centuries. When it was controlled by the Arabs, the Jews were not allowed there from 1949-1967.

        • Helen4Yemen

          “A voluntary reconciliation with the Arabs is out of the question either now or in the future. If you wish to colonize a land in which people are already living, you must provide a garrison for the land, or find some rich man or benefactor who will provide a garrison on your behalf. Or else-or else, give up your colonization, for without an armed force which will render physically impossible any attempt to destroy or prevent this colonization, colonization is impossible, not difficult, not dangerous, but IMPOSSIBLE!… Zionism is a colonization adventure and therefore it stands or falls by the question of armed force. It is important… to speak Hebrew, but, unfortunately, it is even more important to be able to shoot – or else I am through with playing at colonizing.” ( The Iron Wall, 1923)
          ___
          Do you think Jabotinsy was correct back in 1923?

          • Kagey1

            Again you change the topic. Reply about Jerusalem.

        • Helen4Yemen

          “The Palestinian Muslims”

          Why do you try to make the Palestinian Christians as if they do not exist? Do they like being colonized by foreign Europeans? Why do you always write: Muslim-Arab, Muslim-Arab, Muslim-Arab? What about: Christian-Arab?

          Palestine population 1922-1945

          Year —— Muslim ———— Christian ————- Jews
          1922 — 589,177 (78%) — 71,464 (10%) — 83,790 (11%)
          1931 — 761,922 (74%) — 89,174 (9%) — 175,138 (17%)
          1945 — 1,061,270 (60%) — 135,550 (8%) — 553,600 (31%)

          Between 1922 and 1945, the Muslim yearly population growth was 2.6%, the Christians 2.8% and the Jews 8.6% yearly growth.

        • Helen4Yemen

          https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/palestine-jew-land-ownership.png

          Do you dispute that by the time the Ashkenazi arrived in Palestine in the 1880’s, Jews owned only 0.1% of Palestine?

        • Helen4Yemen

          https://i0.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/ashkenazi-dna-is-europe.png?ssl=1&w=700

          Do you have a problem with this image? If so, tell me what your objection is?

          • Kagey1

            Again you change the topic. Reply about Jerusalem.

            • Helen4Yemen

              In less than one hour, you mentioned not changing the topic 6 times. This style is very much from Hasbara Central. It is meant to frustrate. I am always on topic. You are trying to avoid answering questions. Stop practicing your Hasbara training on me.
              ___
              Again all you and Helen 4Yemen can do is change the topic.

              Again you change the topic.

              Don’t change the topic.

              Don’t try to change the topic.

              don’t change the topic.

              don’t change the topic.

            • Helen4Yemen

              I am so glad to see that you have now accepted the fact that the Ashkenazi DNA points in no other direction except Europe. Yes or no?

        • Davey Wavey

          You mean like Zionists have “cleansed” the remaining 78% of Palestine? “Defensive war” they initiated. The “existential threat” they beat in five days? How threatening? Israel will sit down with PA is like Hitler sitting down with Petain, don’t you think? The UN had no authority to divvy up Palestine in the first place and even then they did so disproportionately. Everyone would like the international view of Jerusalem — everyone except the Zionists, that is. How many villages has the Zionist state destroyed in the past 70 years? Just a count, please.

          • Kagey1

            Davey Wavey Egypt started the war by closing the Straits of Tiran to international shipping and ordering the UN peacekeeping force out. Jordan attacked Israel and Israel then captured the Old City of Jerusalem and Judea and Shomron a/k/a the West Bank. It has been trying to negotiate a two state solution since then but the Palestinian preconditions to negotiation are to negotiate from the the 1949 Armistice lines a/k/a the 1967 lines.
            As to Jerusalem, in 1947 the (then) Palestinian Jews agreed to an international Jerusalem.The Palestinian Arabs and the Arab states rejected it. After the Palestinian Jews established the third Jewish state of Israel, the Palestinian Arabs and the surrounding Arab states tried to push them into the sea. They lost and Israel gained more territory than was originally allotted to them in the propose Partition plan. Many of the Palestinian Arabs either fled or were expelled during the course of the war started by them and their Arab allies.
            The Arab states and Israel signed an armistice in 1949 with no formal treaty yet.
            The Arab states then essentially carried out a forced population exchange by expelling the Jews from all the Arab countries, like the forced exchanges between India and Pakistan when the Indian sub-continent was forcibly partitioned.
            Israel has called for negotiations without preconditions let the Palestinians sit down with the Israelis without preconditions.

            • Helen4Yemen

              https://i2.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/how-they-left1.png?ssl=1&w=650

              In 1948, 900,000 Palestinians were expelled by white Europeans. But look at how the Arab Jews left. They took their sweet time leaving meaning there was no expulsion. You are lies about how the left with nothing – just lies.

              • Kagey1

                Gee even UNRWA only reported that there were 711,000 in 1950 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_refugees, see footnote 1, “General Progress Report and Supplementary Report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, Covering the Period from 11 December 1949 to 23 October 1950”. United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine. 1950.) or did you count some more migrants. By the way you should tell whoever faked your table that years do not have a comma in them, when you want to fake something at least take the trouble to make it appear correct. But then again you don’t like to give cites just the numbers you make up like 900,000 “refugees”. By the way, how many of them just made it in by the skin of their teeth having been there only since 1946 like the changed definition of refugee to suit the “refugees” who were only there from 1946 as only the definition for Palestinian refugees provides.

                As to the Jewish refugees at least t 260,000 were chased out by 1950. The rest afterwards but they weren’t allowed to take their property.

                • Helen4Yemen

                  https://www-tc.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/files/2014/11/AlanDershowitzDNA.jpg

                  How much more can a European be more than 99.9% European? Only 100%!

                  • Kagey1

                    Gee you don’t like to respond to my proof of your mistakes to say that I’m wrong so I must be right about your exaggerating the number of Palestinian refugees and your faking the table with the commas in the years. You still have not given a cite for that. As to your diatribe about Ashkenazi Jews I will respond when you first respond to me. It seems to be a characteristic of you,TecumsehUnfaced that when you can’t respond intelligently to a post you try to change the subject, usually by ranting on about how Ashkenazi Jews are not descendants of the original Jews. I will respond to that after you respond. I will not change the topic nor respond to your attempts to do so.

                    • Helen4Yemen

                      https://i1.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/dna-dershowitz.png?ssl=1&w=900

                      Look at the map of Alan Dershowitz’s DNA. Europe is highlighted to indicate the bulk of his ancestry. Even East Asian is highlighted even though he only has 0.1% ancestry. Africa too is shown in color for just a tiny trace of less than 0.1%. But guess what areas show no trace of ancestry? The Middle East that is left blank in white color. Can you explain why the Ashkenazi who claim to be from the ME have no trace of Middle DNA? Because they are totally a European people. DNA does not lie.

                    • TecumsehUnfaced

                      Funny, when you have you given an intelligent post? When you are refuted, you pretend your are not and demand the answer you want. Which technique number is that in the hasbara handbook?

                • Helen4Yemen
                • TecumsehUnfaced

                  So you admit that the European ZioNazis drove 711,000 from their homes, the minimum number reported by anybody. Good for you! You’ve confessed up to belonging to a gang of savage invading psychopaths.

                  Those commas was obviously thrown in there to frizzle up your little mind. Why didn’t you ask for the sources? Was it because you knew those numbers were correct?

                  • Kagey1

                    No I said that is what UNRWA reported but your mirror image reported there were 900,000. I merely pointed out that even the Palestinian Arab mouthpiece UNRWA did not report that many.

                    • TecumsehUnfaced

                      Kagey1, as long as you talk stupid, I’m not going to answer you.

                      • Kagey1

                        Your mirror image Helen4Yemen loudly proclaimed that 900,000 Palestinian Arabs were misplaced. I pointed out that even the Palestinian toady UNRWA claims that only 711,000 were refugees, not even all being supposedly expelled. I did not agree that in fact any were actually expelled. That is for another discussion.
                        I also point out that the even before the Mandate ended, Palestinian Muslims attacked the Palestinian Jews with the intent of killing them or driving them into the sea. In effect, if there was any expulsion, it was a case of doing to them what they had tried and failed to do the Palestinian Jews. It is hypocritical to complain about expulsions, if any occurred, when you first tried to do that to those same people. It was OK for the Palestinian Muslims to try to push the Palestinian Jews out, but not OK fo have that done to them.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Some sources say 900,000, and atrocities are usually underestimated, so it’s silly for you to try to smear her with blame, when it’s the European ZioNazi thugs that were the sole cause for the conflict.

                          Of course, some of the Arabs fought back against the evil European ZioNazi invaders doing terror and genocide against the indigenes of Palestine. It is of supreme hypocrisy for the the evil ZioNazi thug-invaders and anyone supporting them, that they should criticize the Palestinians and their defenders for wanting to get these foreign monsters out of Palestine. It is extremely mendacious that these European thug-invaders label themselves “Palestinian Jews”, when they were the sickest foreigners to arrive in Palestine since the Crusaders.

                          You’re fun! You make sick lies, which I get to stomp on. Do it again!

                        • Kagey1

                          UNRWA is the most pro-Palestinian Arab you can find. I call her out because she did that without naming the source. Which source says 900,000? You don’t say which one either.
                          As to the rest, they were Palestinian Jews. That is how the world, including the Arab world called them. Britain announced the Mandate would end April 15, 1948, and the proposed Partition Plan was rejected by the Palestinian Muslim Arabs and he Arab states (as best as I can tell the Palestinian Christian Arabs took no public position) but accepted by the Palestinian Jews in November 1947. Immediately afterwards, the Palestinian Muslims attacked all the Jewish communities with the intention of killing them or driving them into the sea. After these attacks, continued for about 5 months, the Palestinian Jews fought back. After the Mandate ended, the Arab armies invaded and joined with the Palestinian Muslims inside the Mandatory borders. The Palestinian Jews succeeded. The Palestinian Muslim Arabs started the war in an attempt to kill the Palestinian Jews or drive them into the sea They were attacked and fought back. If the Palestinian Muslims hadn’t attacked first, there would have been 2 states, with Jerusalem and environs as an international city, and no one being involuntarily displaced. The Palestinian Jews had no choice in the war.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          Remember, Kagey1, I said I wasn’t going to reply to you, if you were being stupid again. Since you’ve decided to abuse me with more mendacious stupidity and defecate into my mailbox, I have to block you.

                        • Kagey1

                          I reply to your posts on a public forum. You can choose to reply or not reply. I have posted true statements that you don’t like because they refute your story as to what occurred. What is factually incorrect about what I have said? Please point it out with sources.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          “The Palestinian Muslim Arabs started the war”
                          And where were the Palestinian Christians? They did not defend their country from foreign aggression?

                          https://i1.wp.com/dmop.pt/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/tabela1.png

                        • Kagey1

                          Again where is the cite for this table? But then you don’t like to give cites for your “facts”. Then they could be checked.

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/compare109.png?w=1496

                          Is the white dude in the middle “a Palestinian Jew”?

                        • Helen4Yemen
                        • Helen4Yemen

                          “As to the rest, they were Palestinian Jews.
                          That is how the world, including the Arab world
                          called them.”

                          Al-Falsteen Al-Yahudi?

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          “Partition Plan was rejected by the Palestinian Muslim Arabs”

                          And Palestinian Christian Arabs accepted it?

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          “Palestinian Muslim Arabs started the war”

                          And where were the Palestinian Christian Arabs?

                          Asleep while their land was being stolen? Who would defend their
                          land if they did not? This “Muslim-Arab” nonsense is sickening
                          hasbara by foreign people from Europe,

                        • Helen4Yemen

                          Benny Morris:

                          _ “The revised book is a double-edged sword. It is based on many documents that were not available to me when I wrote the original book, most of them from the Israel Defense Forces Archives. What the new material shows is that there were far more Israeli acts of massacre than I had previously thought. To my surprise, there were also many cases of rape. In the months of April-May 1948, units of the Haganah [the pre-state defense force that was the precursor of the IDF] were given operational orders that stated explicitly that they were to uproot the villagers, expel them and destroy the villages themselves.
                          _ In Acre four soldiers raped a girl and murdered her and her father. In Jaffa, soldiers of the Kiryati Brigade raped one girl and tried to rape several more. At Hunin, which is in the Galilee, two girls were raped and then murdered. There were one or two cases of rape at Tantura, south of Haifa. There was one case of rape at Qula, in the center of the country. At the village of Abu Shusha, near Kibbutz Gezer [in the Ramle area] there were four female prisoners, one of whom was raped a number of times. And there were other cases. Usually more than one soldier was involved. Usually there were one or two Palestinian girls. In a large proportion of the cases the event ended with murder. Because neither the victims nor the rapists liked to report these events, we have to assume that the dozen cases of rape that were reported, which I found, are not the whole story. They are just the tip of the iceberg.”
                          _ In some cases four or five people were executed, in others the numbers were 70, 80, 100. There was also a great deal of arbitrary killing. Two old men are spotted walking in a field – they are shot. A woman is found in an abandoned village – she is shot. There are cases such as the village of Dawayima [in the Hebron region], in which a column entered the village with all guns blazing and killed anything that moved.
                          _ “The worst cases were Saliha (70-80 killed), Deir Yassin (100-110), Lod (250), Dawayima (hundreds) and perhaps Abu Shusha (70). There is no unequivocal proof of a large-scale massacre at Tantura, but war crimes were perpetrated there. At Jaffa there was a massacre about which nothing had been known until now. The same at Arab al Muwassi, in the north. About half of the acts of massacre were part of Operation Hiram [in the north, in October 1948]: at Safsaf, Saliha, Jish, Eilaboun, Arab al Muwasi, Deir al Asad, Majdal Krum, Sasa. In Operation Hiram there was a unusually high concentration of executions of people against a wall or next to a well in an orderly fashion.
                          _ “That can’t be chance. It’s a pattern. Apparently, various officers who took part in the operation understood that the expulsion order they received permitted them to do these deeds in order to encourage the population to take to the roads. The fact is that no one was punished for these acts of murder. Ben-Gurion silenced the matter. He covered up for the officers who did the massacres.”
                          _ One of the revelations in the book is that on October 31, 1948, the commander of the Northern Front, Moshe Carmel, issued an order in writing to his units to expedite the removal of the Arab population. Carmel took this action immediately after a visit by Ben-Gurion to the Northern Command in Nazareth. There is no doubt in my mind that this order originated with Ben-Gurion. Just as the expulsion order for the city of Lod, which was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, was issued immediately after Ben-Gurion visited the headquarters of Operation Dani [July 1948].”
                          _ “From April 1948, Ben-Gurion is projecting a message of transfer. There is no explicit order of his in writing, there is no orderly comprehensive policy, but there is an atmosphere of [population] transfer. The transfer idea is in the air. The entire leadership understands that this is the idea. The officer corps understands what is required of them. Under Ben-Gurion, a consensus of transfer is created.”
                          _ “Of course Ben-Gurion was a transferist. He understood that there could be no Jewish state with a large and hostile Arab minority in its midst. There would be no such state. It would not be able to exist.”
                          _ “Ben-Gurion was right. If he had not done what he did, a state would not have come into being. That has to be clear. It is impossible to evade it. Without the uprooting of the Palestinians, a Jewish state would not have arisen here.”
                          _ That is what Zionism faced. A Jewish state would not have come into being without the uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary to uproot them. There was no choice but to expel that population. It was necessary to cleanse the hinterland and cleanse the border areas and cleanse the main roads.

                        • Kagey1

                          I assume you are quoting Benny Morris’s “The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem revisited” or part of it. Yes or no?

                        • Helen4Yemen
                    • TecumsehUnfaced

                      Poor kagey1! He can’t muster any believable arguments, so he whines that he see mirror images when he gets stomped on.

            • Helen4Yemen

              https://worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/compare109.png?w=1496

              “Palestinian Jews”? Who? The Ashkenazi is “Palestinian Jew”?
              DNA has in fact confirmed that the white Jews like the Ashkenazi
              in the middle has a DNA score of 99.9% European and 0% ME.

          • Helen4Yemen

            Hi! Your kind of comments are rare, actually very rare, coming from Jews on the question of Palestine. I followed your comment history and found the comment that I am quoting below that you posted at the Forward. I have intense interest in the ME politics because I happen to be from the region and the Palestinians are my brothers and sisters. Why did I say your comments are very rare? Because even the best of the ‘good Jews’ (as I call them) only pretend to speak for Palestinians and scratch beneath the surface and you will find a full blown Zionist: Finkelstein, Amy Goodman, Avi Shlaim, Chomsky … there is none that I can think of who is not a pretender. Write back and we can hopefully start a dialogue.

            Jews characterize themselves as white. We became “white” by colonizing Palestine with the intention of becoming just “like everyone else” (meaning just like other European states!) Having join the imperialist camp, forming a nation (like everyone else) Jews were at once entitled to ENJOY “white supremacy” and thereafter, and ever after, Jews became white men. Most do look like white folks and those who are “of color” raise interesting genetic questions about “race” and “ethnicity” and tribal religion. Israel is devoted to ethnicity, at least one century too late. And Jews have enjoyed privilege (as white people) since the forties easily, partly through accomplishment, successful colonization (how the French envied the easy colonization of Palestine compared to, say Viet Nam!) and much success in the American capitalist system and academy and partly by virtue of militarism, much respected by the Pentagon and among the political elite in the US. As for actual ancestry — it is a crap shoot. Few Jews evidence any appearance of origins in the ME and there were historical mass conversions both in Asia and Africa. Zionism made Jews a “nationality” but a white Ashkenazi nationality, like “Serbian” or “French”. The important thing is — a Jew can be a Frenchman, but a Frenchman can’t be a Jew. These dice are loaded with hubris. If we abandon victimhood, we lose identity because Judaism certainly doesn’t tie us together. Sail on, poor victim.

            • Jack

              Helen4Yemen
              “I have intense interest in the ME politics because I happen to be from the region and the Palestinians are my brothers and sisters.”
              What a hypocrite, look at your country first Yemen….. you don’t give a damn regarding your own people, while playing caring for the Palestinians.
              You are a LIAR you don’t care about the Palestinians, you are just another Jew Hater.

              READ REGARDING THE KILLINGS IN YOUR COUNTRY YEMEN.
              The Huthi armed group and allied forces have endangered the lives of thousands of civilians in the southern city of Ta’iz by blocking the entry of crucial medical supplies and food in recent months. Most of the city’s hospitals were forced to shut down, and the few that remain open have been on the verge of collapse due to a lack of supplies.

              Women and girls remained subject to discrimination and abuses including forced marriage and female genital mutilation. Courts handed down death sentences and executions were carried out.

              The Huthi armed group and their allies laid internationally banned anti-personnel landmines that caused civilian casualties; dozens of civilians were killed or injured by landmines when returning to their homes in the second half of the year after fighting ended in Aden and the surrounding area.

              Huthis and their allies carried out cross-border attacks from northern Yemen that could amount to war crimes, indiscriminately shelling Najran and other civilian-populated areas in southern Saudi Arabia.

              Huthis and their allied forces used live ammunition to fire at peaceful protesters on 16 February, wounding three protesters, and on 21 February, killing protester Nasr al-Shuja’.

              In Ta’iz, the pro-Huthi Central Security Forces used excessive force, including tear gas and live fire, to disperse peaceful demonstrations from 22 to 25 March, killing at least eight protesters and wounding at least 30 others. Almost 300 protesters and bystanders required treatment for tear gas inhalation.

              In Sana’a, Huthis and their allied forces detained three protesters on 11 February and tortured them over the following four days; one, Salah ‘Awdh al-Bashri, died from injuries he sustained during hours of torture.

              • TecumsehUnfaced

                Very twisted false narrative of the Saudi-ZioNazi assault on Yemen! Congratulations!

                Note the simple difference between Helen4Yemen and Helenof Yemen. Does it mean anything to you?

                • Jack

                  TecumsehUnfaced – It’s about time that you will declare that your Siamese twin Helen4Yemen is a Yemen who endorse the Huthi killers .
                  The Houthi and the Saudi are the same bloody killers. who share the same killing culture that you both endorse.

                  • TecumsehUnfaced

                    Ooh, a demented little troll yammering at me!

                    But at it understands why the Saudi and the ZioNazi thugs are such good friends. Birds of a feather flock together.

                    • Jack

                      TecumsehUnfaced – The Saudi and the Houthis share the same religion, they are both KILLERS of civilians that you and your Siamese twin Helen4Yemen endorse.
                      you are killers supporters .

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        But the Saudi are secret ZioNazis. That is why they are murderous as the ZioNazi thugs, like the barbarian Menachem Begin.

                        http://smoloko.com/wp-content/uploads/MenachemBeginTerroristIsraelMeme.jpg
                        .

                        • Jack

                          TecumsehUnfaced – ignorant who are you trying to fool with your pictures.
                          The Suadi and Houthis share the same Religion, they are both cold blooded murderers that share the same religion, The Suadi and Houthis are killing innocent civilians, while you and your Siamese twin Helen4Yemen endorse those killers and support them.

                        • TecumsehUnfaced

                          No, they don’t. The Saudis are cold-blooded killers, because they are secret ZioNazi thugs and act like the ZioNazi thugs they are.

                          Since you are a one track, automated troll, I’m not talking with any more.

                        • Jack

                          TecumsehUnfaced – You and your Siamese twin Helen4Yemen are the trolls, your cut and paste spew are all over the internet, same pictures same stupid DNA conspiracy issues, all based on your Jew Hate Agenda.
                          While you both endorse the Huthi killers that kill thousands of innocent civilians.
                          Here is the amnesty international report :

                          The Huthi armed group and allied forces have endangered the lives of thousands of civilians in the southern city of Ta’iz by blocking the entry of crucial medical supplies and food in recent months. Most of the city’s hospitals were forced to shut down, and the few that remain open have been on the verge of collapse due to a lack of supplies.

                          Women and girls remained subject to discrimination and abuses including forced marriage and female genital mutilation. Courts handed down death sentences and executions were carried out.

                          The Huthi armed group and their allies laid internationally banned anti-personnel landmines that caused civilian casualties; dozens of civilians were killed or injured by landmines when returning to their homes in the second half of the year after fighting ended in Aden and the surrounding area.

                          Huthis and their allies carried out cross-border attacks from northern Yemen that could amount to war crimes, indiscriminately shelling Najran and other civilian-populated areas in southern Saudi Arabia.

                          Huthis and their allied forces used live ammunition to fire at peaceful protesters on 16 February, wounding three protesters, and on 21 February, killing protester Nasr al-Shuja’.

                          In Ta’iz, the pro-Huthi Central Security Forces used excessive force, including tear gas and live fire, to disperse peaceful demonstrations from 22 to 25 March, killing at least eight protesters and wounding at least 30 others. Almost 300 protesters and bystanders required treatment for tear gas inhalation.

                          In Sana’a, Huthis and their allied forces detained three protesters on 11 February and tortured them over the following four days; one, Salah ‘Awdh al-Bashri, died from injuries he sustained during hours of torture..

          • robert affinity

            Except none of those claims are true.

            About 20% of all Israelis are Palestinian Arabs who are Israeli citizens (as are 20% of elected MKs in Parliament).

            Yes. Defensive war, initiated by Arab states.

            How threatening, quite threatening.

            You are right the UN did not have right to divvy up Palestine. And they didn’t.
            League of nations did decades earlier.
            UN suggestion was to grant independence with borders based on demographic majority.
            The UN suggested international Jerusalem.
            Arabs invaded and ethnically cleansed every Jew from Jerusalem, (and WB and Gaza) and systematically destroyed every Jewish holy site possible and began destroying all Jewish graves until bulldozer accident scared them.
            Myth that Israel “destroyed” many Arab villages confuses Arab villages abandoned by Arabs fleeing war zone created by genocidal Arab armies with Israel destroying them.