Anthrax And “Russiagate”: Mueller’s Special Counsel Appointment Should Raise Concern

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller’s irresponsible handling of the 2001 anthrax attacks left one man dead by his own hand and forever tarnished the reputation of another. Mueller is now heading the “Russiagate” investigation, despite his demonstrated lack of competence.
By @FluorescentGrey |
Be Sociable, Share!
    • Google+

    OAKLAND (Analysis) — Amidst the overwhelming bipartisan praise given to former FBI Director Robert Mueller for his appointment as special counsel in the Trump-Russia investigation, few media outlets have voiced concern over his credentials. Mueller’s unforgivably poor performance during an investigation into the 2001 anthrax scare should give pause to those who hope to find out the truth about Russia’s alleged involvement in U.S. politics.

    In October 2001 – less than a month after the 9/11 terror attacks – weaponized anthrax spores were sent through the U.S. mail system to prominent politicians and journalists. The anthrax attacks generated hysteria and panic, as well as created the perception that terrorism was going to remain a major threat, with 9/11 representing just the first wave.

    The anthrax attacks also provided the George W. Bush administration with the opportunity to create a three-way connection in the public consciousness between the 9/11 attacks, the anthrax attacks, and Saddam Hussein. The “WMD lies” that would lead the U.S. into war in Iraq were hatched from one initial lie: that the anthrax mailings had fingerprints that could be traced back to the Iraqi government’s biological weapons program and that they represented a second wave of terrorism.



    Major players in the U.S. government made strong efforts to link the anthrax attacks to the Iraqi government – efforts that Mueller played no part in. But in the following six years, Mueller did participate in a public disinformation campaign that muddied the waters regarding the 2001 anthrax attacks.

    He and his bureau were in a position to unravel the underlying rationale for mounting an illegal invasion that left over a million Iraqi civilians dead. Instead, they worked to bury that rationale and stoke fears that would help to prop up public support for the invasion. Looking back at the way in which the case was handled, it is clear that Mueller may not be the most suitable candidate for heading the ongoing investigation into “Russiagate.”

     

    Flimsy evidence and false accusations

    As early as Nov. 9, 2001 – less than one month after the anthrax attacks began – the FBI had identified anthrax in the letters as being of the “Ames strain,” a strain of anthrax that was isolated by U.S. researchers in 1981. Due to its domestic origins, the FBI concluded that the attacks were likely perpetrated by someone working within the U.S. and not by a foreign actor.

    Despite having this knowledge, the Bush administration sent then-Secretary of State Colin Powell to the UN with a prop vial of anthrax in order to obtain support for the Iraq War. Mueller could’ve turned the course of events at the time by making sure the press was aware that the most likely culprit was inside the U.S., but instead chose not to interfere with Bush’s neoconservative agenda. Powell’s presentation of “evidence” of Iraq’s alleged possession of chemical and biological weapons formed a major part of the U.S. effort to build a case for war in Iraq – although the country’s possession of these weapons would eventually prove to be a falsehood.

    In another pivotal moment in the case, Mueller privately briefed Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and  former Senator Tom Daschle – both of whom were targeted with anthrax letters – regarding the FBI’s prime suspect, a retired bioweapons scientist named Steven Hatfil.

    Mueller’s best evidence came from bloodhounds, who had evidently traced the scent from the anthrax letters to Hatfil’s apartment. What Mueller neglected to mention is that bloodhound scent evidence is often inaccurate and has even led to wrongful convictions. But it was too late for Hatfil, as the press had already begun to crucify him after the FBI came forward with its “evidence.” Some agents even used the bloodhounds as props in press conferences that could be better described as publicity stunts.

    Hatfil’s life was turned upside-down by the accusations. He was hounded by the FBI and other authorities, facing deliberate harassment tactics often referred to as “bumper locking.” He tearfully denied the FBI’s accusations during two news conferences held in August 2002, but by that time his life and career had already been shredded to pieces due to his naming as a “person of interest” in the investigation. Hatfil would later receive a $4.6-million-dollar settlement from the FBI in 2008 after filing a lawsuit against the Bureau, but only after five years of litigation and the destruction of his personal and professional reputation.

    But Mueller and the FBI weren’t done yet. That same year, they ended up pinning the attacks on a man named Bruce Ivins, a senior biodefense researcher at Maryland’s Fort Detrick military installation. Their accusation would lead Ivins to commit suicide by overdosing on a combination of Tylenol and codeine, a method of suicide that some thought to be an unlikely choice for someone with Ivins’ level of biological expertise.

    Even after claiming to have solved the case, the FBI faced skepticism regarding its conclusions. Leahy spoke to Mueller at a three-hour public hearing, stating that he did not believe that Ivins was the only culprit:

    “I believe there were others involved either before or after the fact who were complicit…I believe there are others involved who could be charged with murder.”

    Leahy’s Republican counterpart, former Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, also questioned the FBI’s findings:

    “I’ve looked over a good bit of the evidence on the anthrax case just to contrast prosecutors’ opinions…and I have grave doubts about sufficiency of evidence for proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”

    When the FBI decided to give a press conference on the final conclusion of their investigation, Mueller declined to attend, eating dinner at a restaurant about a block away. He instead allowed two lower-ranking investigators to sweat their way through the surprisingly adversarial questions that were lobbed at them by attending journalists.

    Video of this press conference shows an almost unanimously incredulous press pool, some even visibly angry over the series of non-answers given to them by FBI officials. They offered only one piece of physical evidence to the public: a flask they said contained spores that they claimed Ivins used to grow a colony of the “Ames strain” during his off-hours at Ft. Detrick. But there was one major problem with their “smoking gun” evidence.

    Watch the FBI press conference below:

    The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was asked by the FBI to verify the evidence but concluded that anthrax found in the flask could not be traced back to anthrax contained in the letters. But instead of waiting for the NAS to release these findings, Mueller allowed the FBI to pre-empt the NAS with their own press conference. A 2011 report from the National Research Council also called the FBI’s findings into question.

     

    Russiagate: why the anthrax case matters

    In light of his poor handling of the anthrax case, one has to wonder: why is the media now celebrating Mueller’s appointment as special counsel for the Russia-Trump investigation? One doesn’t need to look far to find multiple parallels between the false WMD claims made by the Bush administration – which had their origins in the anthrax scare – and the media’s current obsession with finding evidence of Russian meddling in last year’s election. In both cases, the media fixated on questionable evidence and the creation of an artificial “bogeyman” to advance a deeper, more sinister agenda.

    Both the false WMD claims that led the U.S. into the Iraq War and the ongoing Russia scaremongering campaign have relied on a vague three-way connection between unrelated parties in order to shoehorn in a larger national security and foreign policy scheme. Under Bush, this was done by artificially connecting 9/11 to the anthrax attacks, and then to Saddam Hussein, creating a climate of fear. That same climate is being recreated now – only this time, the specter is Russia.

    Democrats and their allies are using a similar psychological warfare campaign to create a fictitious three-way connection between Trump, Russia and WikiLeaks in the public consciousness during a time of emotional trauma for Democratic voters. The larger theory posits that all three parties were colluding with each other to take down Hillary Clinton — even if no proof has been offered that Russia was WikiLeaks’ source.

    This narrative has been bolstered by the use of weaponized mainstream media terms like “fake news” and an increasingly prevalent McCarthy-esque mindset among Clinton voters who are quick to accuse their opponents of being Putin apologists. Even supporters of Bernie Sanders, who was running on the Democratic ticket just as Clinton was, have faced such accusations.

    Americans should not want a man who knew the Bush administration was trying to create a fictional connection between Hussein, anthrax and 9/11 to have the final verdict on another new three-way fiction: the conspiratorial web being woven between WikiLeaks, Trump and Russia.

    Robbie Martin is a writer and documentary filmmaker behind  “A Very Heavy Agenda, & American Anthrax.  He also co-hosts Media Roots Radio with Abby Martin.

    Be Sociable, Share!

     

    Print This Story Print This Story
    You Might Also Like  
    ___________________________________________
    This entry was posted in Front Page: Inside Stories, Inside Stories, National, Top Stories and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
    • Pingback: Supreme Court: Immunity For Former Bush Officials Over 9/11 Detentions()

    • Pingback: SHOCKING: A Former FBI Special Agent Has Just Exposed Robert Mueller and James Comey – The Washington Feed()

    • Pingback: Mueller & Comey: Just who are these two clowns? | SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary()

    • Pingback: I UV | Comey and Mueller: Russiagate’s Mythical Heroes()

    • Pingback: Comey and Mueller: Russiagate’s Mythical Heroes | True News Global()

    • Mikronos

      The ‘US ‘anthrax scare’ was only meant as a precursor for Powell’s mystical ‘anthrax ampoules/ Had he waglled those without the incident most Amerivcans would have had a clue about how terriying was the purported threat. They knew about the havoc a few powdrered aanvelopes caused – the sickenigs and two horrible deaths – so when Abdam Clayton Poewwell told the world that Sadam was loading up the milssiles to infect the universe they sarted shaking, and demanding some military-industrial payback. They got that in spades.

      Mueller’s job was to find a ‘patsy’ to make the ‘problem’ go away. He did that, apparently, very well and cleaned things up just dandy – no trial, no muss, no fuss – a self-executed perrp with problems, access, opportunity and a hatred for his country. More ipmortantly he ‘ended the threat’.

      But where do they get people with mugs like that? He gives the ‘Ugly American’ a bad name.

    • Pingback: Russia-Gate’s Mythical ‘Heroes’ | PopularResistance.Org()

    • Pingback: The 4th Media » The Russia-gate’s Mythical ‘HEROS’()

    • Pingback: Russia-gate’s Mythical ‘Heroes’ | Counter Information()

    • James Wherry

      This article is a great work of fiction! Robert Mueller was a brilliant FBI Director and a consummate professional. When his 10-year term was up, President Obama asked him to stay on for two more years, while he looked for someone of Mueller’s caliber – and it still took two years to find James Comey.

      I recommend that the author add some aliens or dragons and then contact Baen Publishing.

    • James Wherry

      The Muslim mind: Muslims in the world’s “largest Muslim democracy” recently voted out the Christian Governor in Jakarta when many, many Muslim preachers told them that they could not vote for a non-Muslim to “rule over them” due to verses in the Koran.

      “Christian governor of Jakarta ousted after tense election in world’s biggest Muslim country ”
      Simon Roughneen, April 19, 2017
      http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-indonesia-jakarta-election-20170419-story.html

      He is now going to spend two years in prison. His crime: “BLASPHEMING ISLAM BY SUGGESTING THAT THE KORAN DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS!”

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d5154ec8fe1dc0b4dd170ea24d9ababadafc6674f26e75dca5b5506630dcfcdf.jpg

    • James Wherry
      • James Wherry

        Is that neo-NAZ! Pedophile “tapatio” being allowed to post on this website, AGAIN?!?

    • tapatio
    • Natalie Clark

      Lockerbie is another example of Mueller’s handiwork. The information coming out on the planted airplane evidence is particularly disturbing. Mueller is trying hard to protect his name- but the records coming out are very interesting. Mueller seems to be involved in many major US events- 9/11, Lockerbie, anthrax. All of which look like frame jobs/coverups. All this noise about mueller being honest is setting up the American people to accept Mueller’s findings- just like Comey.

      • James Wherry

        Libya took responsibility for what it did and paid for its crimes. You’re fantasies about “planted evidence” are simply non-sense.

        • Natalie Clark

          Court records from testimony of Richard Fuisz exposed that Libya did not responsible for Lockerbie. That’s why the U.K. Released the person jailed for it. The CIA secretly held Syrian militants, rather than Libya, responsible for the Lockerbie bombing, according to newly unearthed testimony from a former US spy in the Middle East.

          Dr Richard Fuisz said in a sworn deposition in that he was told by up to 15 senior Syrian officials that the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC) had carried out the attack.

          The court records provide detailed info and gov docs- all sworn under oath. Robert mueller is not too happy more is coming out as time and four records move forward to set the historical record straight on what happened

          • James Wherry

            So, you’re telling me we should bomb the Syrian government and destroy all Palestinian terrorist groups once and for all?

            Hmmmmm. Tempting. . . .

            But no: the judges weighed all the evidence and determined that Libya was responsible. Libya later admitted it and paid reparations.

    • James Wherry

      This article is a great work of fiction! Robert Mueller was a brilliant FBI Director and a consummate professional. When his 10-year term was up, President Obama asked him to stay on for two more years, while he looked for someone of Mueller’s caliber – and it still took two years to find James Comey.

      I recommend that the author add some aliens or dragons and then contact Baen Publishing.

    • Pingback: Anthrax and Russiagate: Robert Mueller’s Appointment Raises Concern – anticorruptionnzblog()

    • JDESQ

      The author of the bogus report on WMD is the worst possible pick for this investigation into the absurd charges of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. He was also complicit in covering up the Saudi role in running 911.

    • Pingback: Mueller’s Special Counsel Appointment Should Raise Concern()

    • TecumsehUnfaced

      Thank very much for publishing this story by Robbie Martin. It has a lot of important information that I missed, because my attention was elsewhere at the time.

      But I’m not surprised. He is a former FBI director, which shows that he is a team player oblivious to ethics as needed.

      I think his role is make sure the investigation does not reveal too much to the public and to block any other investigation that may cause discomfort. Of course, whatever is discovered by his investigation will be preserved for blackmail later.