• Support MPN
Logo Logo
  • Investigations
  • Analysis
  • Cartoons
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Language
    • 中文
    • русский
    • Español
    • Français
    • اَلْعَرَبِيَّةُ
  • Support MPN
  • Watch | Gaza Fights Back
#2020Election

Michael Bloomberg Is Trying To take Down Bernie Sanders, Not Trump

Decision To Remove Judge In Stop-And-Frisk Case Deeply Flawed: Civil Rights Lawyers

Civil Rights attorneys argued that removing Judge Scheindlin, who had earlier ruled that the NYPD must change its stop-and-frisk policy, was unwarranted.

November 13th, 2013
Katie Rucke
November 13th, 2013
By Katie Rucke
In this June 20, 2012 file photo, Det. Anthony Mannuzza, left, and Police Officer Robert Martin, right, simulate a street stop during a training session at the New York Police Department's training facility in Rodman's Neck, in the Queens borough of New York (AP Photo/Colleen Long, File)

The U.S. Court of Appeals' decision to remove District Judge Shira Scheindlin from examining the constitutionality of the New York Police Department’s stop-and-frisk policy was “unprecedented and unwarranted," according to civil rights attorneys who filed an appeal on Monday in the federal appeals court. The lawyers argued that the three judges

Read Full Article

  • Contact Us
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2025 MintPress News