• Support MPN
  • Behind The Headlines
Logo Logo
  • Investigations
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Cartoons
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Language
    • 中文
    • русский
    • Español
  • Support MPN
President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, center, attends a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, April 20, 2017. (AP/Andrew Harnik)

Trump Considering Constitutional Amendment To Curb Critical Media Coverage

Follow Us

  • Rokfin
  • Telegram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, center, attends a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, April 20, 2017. (AP/Andrew Harnik)

President Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, center, attends a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, April 20, 2017. (AP/Andrew Harnik)

According to U.S. President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Reince Priebus, the administration is still reviewing the country’s libel laws in a bid to prosecute journalists.

Priebus told ABC News’ This Week host Jonathan Karl that Trump was considering a possible constitutional amendment. “I think it’s something that we’ve looked at, and how that gets executed or whether that goes anywhere is a different story,” he added. “But when you have articles out there that have no basis or fact and we’re sitting here on 24/7 cable companies writing stories about constant contacts with Russia and all these other matters…”

When challenged by Karl about the actual possibility of Trump suing media entities for stories he does not agree with, Priebus retorted, “Here’s the thing… I think that newspaper and news agencies need to be more responsible with how they report the news.” Currently, the U.S. president’s hands are tied when it comes to taking any action regarding criticism from journalists because there are no federal libel laws.

Additionally, the state statutes are difficult to sue under. To win a libel case, a plaintiff must prove, without a doubt, that the defendant published a false and defamatory statement with malicious intent.

A constitutional amendment to stem negative coverage of any administration would require a supermajority in both houses of Congress or a constitutional convention, as well as ratification by three-quarters of the states.

Watch the exchange below:


© teleSUR

 

Comments
teleSUR
May 1st, 2017

What’s Hot

The Assassination of Shireen Abu Akleh: Who Gave the Order?

Censoring Palestine: Swarms of Israeli Bots Are Crippling Pro-Palestinian Twitter Accounts

Say No To Censorship: Here’s How We’re Rebuilding Alternative Media 

Institute for Curriculum Services: How an Israel Lobby Group Infiltrated US Education

The NATO to TikTok Pipeline: Why is TikTok Employing So Many National Security Agents?

 
  • Contact Us
  • Archives
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2022 MintPress News