• Investigations
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Cartoons
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Language
    • 中文
    • русский
    • Español
  • GAZA Fights Back
  • National News
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Elections
  • Civil Liberties
  • Environment
  • Health & Lifestyle
  • Media & Culture
  • MyMPN Announcements

Analysis: Edward Snowden & The Patriot Act’s Section 215

May 8, 2015 by Endarken Follow @endarken @endarken

Supporters hold a picture of Edward Snowden outside the Consulate General of the United States in Hong Kong Thursday, June 13, 2013 as they urge the U.S. government to pardon Edward Snowden and to apologize for the surveillance. A new court ruling on section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act offers new evidence supporting Snowden's revelations. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Supporters hold a picture of Edward Snowden outside the Consulate General of the United States in Hong Kong Thursday, June 13, 2013 as they urge the U.S. government to pardon Edward Snowden and to apologize for the surveillance. A new court ruling on section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act offers new evidence supporting Snowden’s revelations. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Edward Snowden’s courageous acts of whistleblowing have been vindicated again — this time by the United States Second Circuit Federal Court of Appeals.

In Thursday’s long-anticipated and unanimous ruling, Circuit Judges Robert D. Sack and Gerard E. Lynch, along with District Judge Vernon S. Broderick of the United States Court for the Southern District of New York found that the “bulk collection of telephony metadata” exposed by Snowden cannot be justified by the existing provisions of Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act.

In the 97-page ruling, the Appellate Court affirms an earlier December 2013 District Court ruling that the appellants (the American Civil Liberties Union) have standing to sue the government and strongly denies the US Government’s claims of preclusion, secrecy and statutory considerations invalidating the appellants suit, stating in summary (2c): “In short, the government relies on bits and shards of inapplicable statutes, inconclusive legislative history, and inferences from silence in an effort to find an implied revocation of the APA’s authorization of challenges to government actions.” (Page 52 of the judgement, Case 14-42 ACLU v Clapper)

On Page 94 of the finding, the judges state, “The District Court erred in certain respects on several issues of law critical to deciding the legality of the government’s program. On a correct view of those issues, appellants have shown a likelihood — indeed a certainty — of success on the merits of at least their statutory claims.”

While affirming the earlier District Court decision not to order a preliminary injunction (which would halt the domestic program in question) the Court does so in order to give Congress the opportunity to decide, “whether and under what conditions it should continue is a lesser intrusion on appellants’ privacy than they faced at the time this litigation began.” (Page 95)

The judgement also speaks to the severity of the privacy issues inherent within the collection of telephony meta-data — something that Edward Snowden has repeatedly discussed in interviews and speeches about bulk collection — with the Court writing: “The more metadata the government collects and analyzes … the greater the capacity for such metadata to reveal ever more private and previously unascertainable information about individuals … in today’s technologically based world, it is virtually impossible for an ordinary citizen to avoid creating metadata about himself on a regular basis simply by conducting his ordinary affairs.” (Page 10)

It appears the collection has been conducted over a much longer period than the average citizen may realise. The Court states: “It is now undisputed that the government has been collecting telephone metadata in bulk under S215 since at least May 2006” (Page 14) — this of course being some seven years prior to Edward Snowden’s first disclosures.

The potential illegality of the program appears to have escaped the notice of the now-infamous “secret” Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). Page 15 points out: “The government has disclosed additional FISC orders reauthorizing the program. FISC orders must be renewed every 90 days, and the program has therefore been renewed 41 times since May 2006.”

And on Page 16: “The government disputes appellants’ characterization of the program as collecting ‘virtually all telephony metadata’ associated with calls made or received in the United States, but declines to elaborate on the scope of the program or specify how the program falls short of that description. It is unclear, however, in what way appellants’ characterization of the program can be faulted.”

Widely having been referenced by intelligence agencies to justify their mass surveillance of domestic communications, Section 215 has been the subject of a recent online campaign attempting to rescind it, with supporters able to call their elected representatives through the campaign website and urged to make statements such as:

I’m one of your constituents, and I’m calling to urge you to end the NSA’s unconstitutional mass surveillance under the Patriot Act and vote no on S. 1035, a bill that would extend expiring portions of the Patriot Act until 2020. NSA surveillance illegally invades my privacy, along with millions of other innocent people, without making me safer. — from “Fight 215: Stop The Patriot Act’s Mass Surveillance”

Backed by a number of privacy and technology organisations, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Government Accountability Project (GAP), Freedom of the Press Foundation and Sunlight Foundation, the campaign has garnered significant attention and bipartisan support.

With efforts such as the Fight215 Coalition alongside this Court of Appeals finding, and the moves by huge technology companies to embrace end-to-end encryption in efforts to at least superficially protect the privacy of their users, Snowden’s disclosures appear more critical than ever to the public interest of American citizens.

As Snowden continues to be lauded internationally for his sacrifice, these recent legal developments may herald the turning of public opinion in America and even within the intelligence services themselves, where he surely deserves to be hailed as a hero and a true patriot, rather than branded traitor.

It’s clearer than ever that Edward Snowden is owed all our gratitude for refusing to obey illegal orders, an act that demonstrates courage and personal integrity of the highest magnitude.

Content posted to MyMPN open blogs is the opinion of the author alone, and should not be attributed to MintPress News.

Filed Under: Civil Liberties, National News Tagged With: American Civil Liberties Union, Edward Snowden, Privacy, surveillance, USA PATRIOT ACT

Comments

  1. sloth says

    May 9, 2015 at 8:26 am

    The war mongers have failed to fully vilify a patriot. If we had a few politicians that did not owe their soul to the devil we would not be in the position we are today. The love of money is the root of all evil and transparency is the root of liberty. Long live Mr. Snowden.

    Reply
  2. Cam says

    May 10, 2015 at 1:52 am

    All we can do is Keep Researching & Spreading the FACTS surrounding Govt, Corporate, Global Financial Corruption & the Illegalities surrounding WAR for Empire & Profit as well as the growing Fascism/Corporatism & Zionism that is Infecting the Planet.
    The Old World Order’s Influence is showing Cracks in its Facarde, the sham they have been pushing for their NWO is running into “Informed Opposition” & the Snowdens & Mannings of this world have had the guts to stand up for Integrity & make massive positive fight in the War against Ignorance & the permiable Cancer of the Zio-Neocon-Fascist-Corporate “One World Governance” which Includes the TPP, TPIP, the Wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan & Ukraine.
    “The End of Democracy & the Defeat of the American Revolution will occur when Government Falls into the hands of the Lending institutions & Moneyed Corporations.” -Thomas Jefferson.
    “Once a nation parts with the Control of its Currency & Credit, it matters NOT who makes the nations laws. USURY will Wreck ANY nation. Until the Control of the ISSUE of Currency & Credit is Restored to Government & Recognized as its MOST SACRED Responsibility, all talk of Sovereignty of Parliament & Democracy, is Idle & Futile.” ~ William Lyon Mackenzie King. (1874-1950) Prime Minister of Canada (1935–1948)

    TPP & TPIP – Corporate Takeovers: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ttp-and-ttip-trade-agreements-a-dystopian-future-in-which-corporations-rather-than-elected-governments-call-the-shots/5447643
    MUST SEE >>> MONEY MASTERS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dq9yjt_JbWs
    ALL Wars are Bankers Wars: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBupAeo4
    Profiting from Crisis Capitalism/The Shock Doctrine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrpA46YS7P0&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
    Economic War is a weapon: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-engineered-decline-in-oil-prices-economic-warfare-is-the-wests-main-weapon/5418545
    1-3 EcHitman/Global Empire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ-3yTYFiHk
    Ec-Hitman how US took-over world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nndAWd6w7xo

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About MyMPN

MyMPN is MintPress News' community site. Anyone can participate by writing a diary and commenting on others' diaries.

Content posted to MyMPN is the opinion of the author alone, and should not be attributed to MintPress News.

MyMPN will cease publishing on January 15, 2017. Thank you for your support of our work.

  • More about MyMPN
  • Report site problems and bugs
  • MyMPN Comment Moderation

Follow Mintpress

RSSTwitterFacebookGooglePlus

Our Latest Posts

In The Age Of Trump, Peaceful Revolt Is Our Only Option

By Kevin Patrick Kelly January 11, 2017

Hafizah Geter Gives Moving Poetic ‘Testimony’ At Medgar Evers College

By José Negroni January 10, 2017

Gonzo Journalism Rejects The Myth Of The Neutral Media

By Dr. Milena Rampoldi January 9, 2017

Aleppo: How The US Manipulates Humanitarianism For Imperialism

By Steven Chovanec January 6, 2017

Why One ‘Remain’ Voter Now Supports A Hard Brexit

By Tara Lighten Msiska January 5, 2017

Hawaiian Kingdom, American Empire: An Interview With Professor Keanu Sai

By Dennis Riches January 4, 2017

War Against Rape In Karachi: Advocating For A Rape Free Society

By Dr. Milena Rampoldi December 30, 2016

What’s In A Name? From ‘Al-Qaeda’ To The ‘Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia’

By Nu’man Abd al-Wahid December 29, 2016

Popular Tags

activism Africa American imperialism Barack Obama Canada capitalism Climate change democracy Democratic Party Donald Trump Egypt election 2016 energy fracking history Human Rights inequality Iraq ISIS Islam Islamic State Israel journalism MENA Middle East mining nuclear oil Palestine police poverty prison propaganda racism Republican Party Russia Saudi Arabia Syria terrorism Texas United Kingdom United Nations Wall Street War water

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter

Copyright © 2022 Mint Press, LLC