JERUSALEM (AP) — Secretary of State John Kerry will present the outlines of a West Bank security plan in meetings with Israeli and Palestinian leaders this week, stepping up American involvement in hopes of reviving faltering Mideast peace efforts, U.S. officials said Wednesday.
The proposal will mark the first time that Kerry, who was to arrive in Israel late Wednesday, has directly intervened in the talks since they began in late July. By all accounts, the negotiations have made no progress, despite an April target date for reaching a deal.
Kerry has lots riding on the outcome of the negotiations. The sides agreed to resume talks, their first substantive dialogue in five years, under heavy pressure by Kerry, and he has repeatedly shuttled to the region and held lengthy phone conversations with Israeli and Palestinian leaders in hopes of pushing them forward.
Negotiators have said discussions touched on all key issues in the long-festering conflict, primarily Israeli security concerns and possible border arrangements between Israel and a future Palestine. But they say the talks have amounted to little more than restating positions.
The Palestinians seek all of the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip, areas captured by Israel in 1967, for an independent state. They say that Israel’s pre-1967 boundaries should be the basis for a future border, allowing for slight modifications through negotiated land swaps.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects a return to the 1967 lines, and has signaled he wants to retain large parts of the West Bank. Netanyahu also opposes any shared control over east Jerusalem, the Palestinians hoped-for capital. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.
The U.S. diplomatic officials said Kerry and his security adviser, retired Gen. John Allen, have been working on security issues in hopes of breaking the deadlock. They believe the absence of any concrete plans so far is a main reason for the lack of progress.
The American officials spoke on condition of anonymity because Kerry has not yet presented his proposals.
The Haaretz daily said that Allen would present his ideas at a meeting with Netanyahu on Thursday. After that meeting, Kerry is scheduled to head to the West Bank for talks with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. It said the American thinking is that if Israeli security concerns can be met, other issues, such as borders, will then fall into place.
One U.S. official said Allen “has been working closely on the ground with his Israeli counterparts.” The official said the Americans realize that security is “paramount” as Israel contemplates taking “calculated risks for peace.”
A U.S. official traveling with Kerry in Moldova on Wednesday said the ideas were not a “plan” that could be accepted or rejected. Instead, it was described as part of an ongoing effort to help ease Israeli security concerns. The official said many of the ideas have already been raised with the Israelis in prior meetings.
The officials refused to provide details on Allen’s work, including whether it might include stationing international forces along the West Bank border with Jordan. Netanyahu has insisted that Israel maintain a security presence in the West Bank as part of any final deal.
Mohammed Ishtayeh, a former Palestinian peace negotiator, said he resigned last month because the gaps with Israel were getting wider.
“We went to these talks to avoid the blame game, we know the result, there will be no result,” he said. “Israel wants to annex the West Bank … It wants to give us some local autonomy over the people and annex the land.”
Israeli and Palestinian officials declined comment on Kerry’s security plan, saying they had not yet seen any details.
But Ishtayeh said he had little faith in the American bridging proposals, saying the U.S. is unfairly biased toward Israel.
The Palestinians have begun to look to the international community’s recent agreement with Iran as a model for solving the conflict with the Israelis.
Under that deal, six world powers offered Iran relief from economic sanctions in exchange for curbs on Iran’s suspect nuclear program. The Palestinians believe that this model of international cooperation, as opposed to U.S. mediation, could provide the needed pressure to persuade Israel to make greater concessions.
“We have to find an alternative to the bilateral talks with Israel because it’s not balanced, and the third party in these talks, the U.S., is making it unbalanced,” Ishtayeh said. “We have alliances in the world, Russia, the United Nations, and we need to start demanding an international conference on Palestine.”
___
Lee reported from Washington. Mohammed Daraghmeh in Ramallah, West Bank, and Lara Jakes in Chisinau, Moldova, contributed to this article.