A number of sites, including Middle East Eye, found videos removed for violating YouTube’s community guidelines after AI flagging.
YouTube has apologized after “mistakenly” removing videos portraying war crimes and other facets of the Syrian civil war by activists and opposition groups.
Last week, a number of organizations – including Middle East Eye, open source investigations site Bellingcat, and monitoring group Airwars – said that a number of their videos had been removed by YouTube for violating the platform’s “community guidelines.”
Furthermore, some media outlets found their entire YouTube accounts suspended, including Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins and Syrian opposition media channel Orient News.
The removals began days after Google, which owns YouTube, trumpeted the arrival of an artificial intelligence program that it said could spot and flag “extremist” videos without human involvement.
But since then vast tracts of footage, including evidence used in the Chelsea Manning court case and videos documenting the destruction of ancient artifacts by Islamic State, have been flagged as “extremist” and deleted from its archives.
However, in a statement released on Wednesday, YouTube conceded it had made the “wrong call” on a number of videos, and said they had been reinstated.
“We recently announced technological improvements to the tools our reviewers use in video takedowns and continue to improve these,” they said, according to the Times.
“With the massive volume of videos on our site, sometimes we make the wrong call. When it’s brought to our attention that a video or channel has been removed mistakenly, we act quickly to reinstate it.”
YouTube told MEE in an email last week that the video “Drone footage by Islamic State shows suicide car attacks on Iraqi forces inside Mosul” was removed and that YouTube had “assigned a community guidelines strike, or temporary penalty” to MEE’s account.
This video has since been restored.
The same occurred in the case of “Video appears to show Egyptian soldiers carrying out extra-judicial killings”. MEE lodged an appeal with YouTube and received this response:
“After further review of the content, we’ve determined that your video does violate our Community Guidelines and have upheld our original decision. We appreciate your understanding.”
Another video, documenting the destruction of Nimrud by IS, which is widely available across the internet, was removed from an MEE staff account, and all appeals were rejected.
Alexa O’Brien, an American journalist who covered the US prosecution of Wikileaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning, said video used as evidence in the 2013 trial had also been removed for violating YouTube’s guidelines.
O’Brien tweeted that, following “reconciliation” with YouTube, another video featuring al-Qaeda was also removed despite also being used as evidence in the trial.
She said that she had received two community strikes and risked having her account deleted.
In response to the deletions, YouTube told MEE by phone that while it could not comment on individual cases, it was not aware that “any particular type of content was being flagged over another”.
“Previously we used to rely on humans to flag content, now we’re using machine learning to flag content which goes through to a team of trained policy specialists all around the world which will then make decisions,” a spokeswoman said.
“So it’s not that machines are striking videos, it’s that we are using machine learning to flag the content which then goes through to humans.”
Top photo: Alleged deployment of white phosphorus munitions by the US in Raqqa, Syria. as reported by ISIS-linked Amaq news. (Photo: YouTube)
Stories published in our Daily Digests section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect MintPress News editorial policy.