Poll: Americans No Longer Believe In American Dream

“There’s a lot of policies that make it easier for the rich to get richer and the poor to go nowhere.”
By @katierucke |
Be Sociable, Share!
    • Google+
    The Cleaver family from the "Leave it to Beaver" television series.  (Photo/ABC Television via Wikimedia Commons)

    The Cleaver family from the “Leave it to Beaver” television series. (Photo/ABC Television via Wikimedia Commons)

    A poll released this week from Bloomberg found that the ever-increasing gap between rich and poor Americans has begun to have a negative impact on the number of Americans who believe in the American dream — the opportunity to be successful and prosperous if people apply themselves.

    The poll, which was conducted from Dec. 6-9, found that 64 percent of Americans now believe that the U.S. is not a place where everyone has an equal chance of success, compared to 33 percent who say it does.

    Ryan Sekac, 26, is a mechanical engineer in Rhode Island. He says he is one of the 64 percent who believes the American dream is no longer a possibility, saying “There’s a lot of policies that make it easier for the rich to get richer and the poor to go nowhere.

    “Everyone on both sides of the aisle talks about the American dream,” Sekac told Bloomberg. “Right now, that’s not something everyone in this country can aspire to.”

    Those respondents who doubted the existence of the American dream also reported that the government isn’t doing much to help lessen the income-gap, and many are OK with that.

    While 45 percent of Americans believe the government should enact legislation to narrow the income gap, the other 46 percent say the market should be left alone — even if the income gap widens.

    And of those polled, 68 percent reported they believed the income gap is growing, while 10 percent reported it’s shrinking; 18 percent reported it is unchanged.

    According to Emmanuel Saez, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, 10 percent of Americans earned more than half of all income in the U.S. last year. He added that the last time there was such a large income disparity was 1917.

    Janet Gornick is a political science and sociology professor at the City University of New York Graduate Center. She said that compared to most other nations such as the U.K., Ireland and Spain, the U.S. does little to reduce income inequality through tax and transfer policies, which probably explains why those who were most supportive of the government intervening made less than $50,000 a year.

    Albert Marini, 66, a retired information technology manager in Virginia Beach, Va., says that while his family is fortunate and able to provide for themselves, he supports government intervention because not everyone is as fortunate as his family is.

    Talking about the increasing income gap, Marini said “If we don’t address it, it’ll just continue to deteriorate, the gap will just continue to get bigger. And who knows what that will lead to in 10 or 15 years? Social unrest? Economic unrest?”

    The issue of income inequality has resurfaced in recent weeks as President Obama addressed the issue in a speech last week, saying that current economic trends have jeopardized the existence of the middle class. He added that along with the extinction of the middle class, the thought that ‘if you work hard, you have a chance to get ahead,’ goes away as well.

    Be Sociable, Share!

    Stories published in our Hot Topics section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Mint Press News editorial policy.


    Print This Story Print This Story
    You Might Also Like  
    This entry was posted in Daily Digest, National, News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
    • Pingback: The Boot-Strap Expat Is Taking Requests! Tell Me What You Want More of. | The Bootstrap Expat()

    • 7thPillar

      This is proof that governmental intervention, including the NGO Federal Reserve intervention in markets is doomed. Had Free Markets been allowed to manage the economy over the last thirty years, cost for essentials such as housing would have ‘corrected’ to what the market can support while incomes have stagnated. Instead we have a fake Consumer Price Index that propagandizes little or no inflation while people in the real world are forced to cut back on everything but essentials just to keep the utilities on. The “real” unemployment rate in the US has been sideways at 23% for over five years! 7%, my ass!

      “Improving Housing market?” Propped up by intervention. “Improving Stock Market?” A Bubble made possible by intervention and QE Infinity. “Falling Precious Metals?” Market manipulation – selling “paper” while physical deliveries can’t keep up with demand.

      If Free Markets were allowed to operate in the USSA, rents and housing costs would parallel the stagnating incomes of the market participants. Good luck finding a home or apartment at 1984 prices.

      Just another reason I’m leaving the US. You can follow my Boot-Strap Expat adventure at http://7thpillar.wordpress.com/

    • biggestbird

      It’s called Fascism people; 15 lobbyists (or more) per representative and money buys loyalty! Loyalty buys (at least the illusion of) power and those in congress and the senate could not be more disconnected from the needs/wants of their constituents; but then again you didn’t get off of all that money to put them into “power” did you, so dry it up and get in the back of the line!!

    • AntiSocialSailor

      We’re just a slightly kinder, gentler version of the same old Banana Republic. You want to get ahead. Don’t bother here. We aren’t even close to #1 in upward social mobility any more. A person born into a poor family has more of a chance advancing his station in Europe than he does here. That’s a major switch from the situation 30 years ago. That’s the real legacy of Ronald Reagan, trickle down and his suicidal attitude that the government is something alien instead of being a mechanism to fulfill the collective will of the citizenry.