KXL Activists Blast Pro-Keystone Dems In Senate

Ahead of possible vote this week, green groups demand tell lawmakers to 'Stand up to Big Oil' and say 'No' to pipeline.
Share this article!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
    • Google+
    Protestors opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline hold signs outside the office of Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, July 26, 2011. Lawmakers in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives are slated to vote Tuesday on a bill, introduced by Terry, that would force U.S. President Barack Obama to make a decision on TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline by Nov. 1. Environmental groups, meantime, have maligned the proposed pipeline, citing the high levels of greenhouse gas emissions associated with Alberta's oilsands. They also point to devastating oil spills like the one in rural Michigan last summer along another Canadian pipeline ó this one operated by Enbridge Inc. ó that also carried diluted bitumen, which environmentalists say is more corrosive than regular crude and poses extra risks to pipelines. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

    Protestors opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline hold signs in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, July 26, 2011.  (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

    Anti-pipeline activists have launched an offensive against the handful of Democratic Senators who may determine the future of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline in a vote slated for this week.

    With rallies outside the offices of “swing” Senators Tom Carper (Del.), Bill Nelson (Fla.) and Bob Casey (Penn.) on Monday and Sen. Mark Udall (Colo.) on Tuesday, protesters are demanding that the legislators hold strong against the intense lobby efforts of the fossil fuel industry and vote against the measure.

    Launching what they call a “full court press,” anti-Keystone activists are “going to be on the phones and in the streets over the coming days to show Senators who are on-the-fence that they have the support they need to stand up to Big Oil and say no to this pipeline,” said Jason Kowalsk, policy director for the environmental group 350.org.

    In a bid to steamroll the approval process for the pipeline, legislators have attached an amendment to the Shaheen-Portman energy bill to override the State Department’s ongoing review of the project.

    However, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is reportedly in talks about whether to hold a vote on a “stand-alone” Keystone bill, put forth last week. Fifty-six lawmakers hoping to force approval of the pipeline need 60 votes to overcome the expected filibuster and 67 votes to override a Presidential veto of the bill.

    The vote is expected to come before the Senate this week, possibly as early as Tuesday, the Hill reports.

    Environmental groups are blasting the 11 Democratic Senators who have joined forces with the GOP in penning the pro-Keystone legislation. The group CREDO Action is calling on people to “hold your senator accountable—and urge them to stop empowering Republicans’ anti-environmental attacks.”

    Jane Kleeb, founder of anti-pipeline group Bold Nebraska, said that the Senate vote is a “purely political move.”

    “It’s really just a piece for folks’ political ads back home in tough re-election campaigns,” Kleeb said on MSNBC’s “The Ed Show,” referring to amendment co-author Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu (D), among others.

    “Canada is looking for a bailout from America,” Kleeb continued. “They have invested in this really awful energy source, the tar sands. It is land-locked. First Nations communities up in Canada are blocking it on their coast. They thought they could get an easy pass through the heartland of America, we stood up to them.” Kleeb added that the one group who hasn’t stood up to them are “politicians.”

    The vote this week is likely the last time the Keystone XL pipeline will be considered legislatively until after the November midterm elections. “Each side thinks they’re going to win,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on Monday.  “It’s going to be real close.”

     

    This article originally appeared in Common Dreams.

    Share this article!

       

      Print This Story Print This Story
      This entry was posted in Daily Digest, Health & Lifestyle, National and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
      • 1949Peg

        Let them build the pipeline, but not for oil………bring water down to our drought plagued states!!

      • Jetta Kyzar

        oh please,you been drinking water in a bottle,and you believe it is out of a spring,more than likely it is out of the faucet,get a job,get a life.if you go by what everyone tells you is bad you would be dead for now.

        • Eugene Kiedrowski

          You stooge, when that water starts costing you more than the precious gasoline that you won’t be benefitting from, what you gonna do? We could easily have energy independence if we banned export of petroleum products. But the Koch suckers would never allow that would they.

      • earlrichards

        The Keystone XL pipeline should not be built, because a toxic, tar sands spill down into the Ogallala Aquifer will poison the drinking water for millions and will destroy the agriculture of the Great Plains state.

        • tomjohnson

          Don’t worry too much. The Ogallala will be dry by 2025 thanks to all of the fracking in the states it encompasses. AND the plains will be the New American Desert from LA to Savanna.

          • earlrichards

            I guess you are right, I never thought of fracking before.