Chomsky Says Republicans Most Dangerous Group In History – Assange Points To CIA

While the Republican Party’s denial of climate change may very well be a major threat to humanity – as academic Noam Chomsky believes – it is perhaps more likely that the CIA and its history of assassination and destabilization are the greater terror facing the modern world.
By | Follow on Facebook | |
Be Sociable, Share!
    • Google+
    Julian Assange (left) with American linguist, philosopher Noam Chomsky on the balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. (Photo: Yui Mok/PA)

    Julian Assange (left) with American linguist, philosopher Noam Chomsky on the balcony of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. (Photo: Yui Mok/PA)

    CHILE (Analysis)  On Monday, Noam Chomsky – renowned linguist, academic and activist – repeated his assertion in an interview with the BBC that the modern U.S. Republican Party is the most dangerous organization in human history, adding that, as an organization, they pose a greater danger to the world than groups like Daesh (ISIS) or North Korea’s leadership – the chief bogeymen of the U.S. establishment.

    The basis for Chomsky’s statement revolved around the Republican Party’s refusal to express an interest in resolving climate change, a stance that Chomsky said is akin to “trying to destroy the prospects for organized human existence.” However, he neglected to touch upon the Democratic Party’s own commitment to fossil fuel use and expanding the industry, as the Democrats – while verbally condemning the phenomenon – have done next to nothing to resolve the problem themselves.

    Chomsky has apparently fallen into an ideological trap that has long defined U.S. politics – the left vs. right paradigm. Per the paradigm, U.S. voters are given two choices to choose from in elections, though parties invariably follow the same longstanding agendas in both foreign and domestic policy issues.



    In this interview, Chomsky has chosen to condemn just one of the organizations that are part of the U.S. political establishment as a whole, which is the real culprit in expanding fossil fuel use and perpetuating imperialism and endless war. His argument is also based on political rhetoric alone, not policy.

    If climate change is the most critical issue to Chomsky, it would be wise of him to note that the U.S. Department of Defense is the world’s largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions as it consumes more fossil fuels than any other institution in the world. Both the Republican and Democratic parties – as institutions – unequivocally support militarism and the expansion of the military – and by extension, a continued increase in carbon emissions.

    In addition, both parties have ensured over the years that the U.S. military will remain exempt from all international climate change agreements.

    Watch Chomsky’s recent interview with BBC NewsNight below:

    While Chomsky has chosen to dwell on a particular subset of U.S. establishment politicians as the gravest threat to humanity, another prominent activist recently called out a different organization that may be more fitting of the title.

    Julian Assange, the founder of transparency organization WikiLeaks and a political prisoner, told RT in an email on Tuesday that “the CIA is the world’s most dangerously incompetent spy agency. It has armed terrorists, destroyed democracies and installed and maintained dictatorships the world over.”

    Listen to Julian Assange talk to journalist Jeremy Scahill about the CIA’s war on WikiLeaks:

    Assange’s comments came after a harsh response from the CIA regarding WikiLeaks’ “Vault 7” releases, which detail a secret arsenal of top secret CIA hacking tools that the agency not only lost control over but used to eviscerate consumer privacy.

    Assange makes several good points about the U.S. intelligence agency. The CIA has proven itself incompetent on numerous occasions throughout its history and has been involved in innumerable examples of regime change, the destabilization of entire countries and assassinations.

    While those sympathetic to the U.S. establishment may defend such action as being necessary to preserve democracy or prevent the spread of communism, evidence shows that the CIA often carries out such action at the behest of U.S. corporate interests, endangering innocent civilians and ruining entire countries’ hopes for self-determination in the process.

    Were Chomsky’s ideal government to emerge in the U.S. or elsewhere with a real plan to tackle climate change and end fossil fuel consumption, history shows that it would be the CIA that would step in to overthrow them – particularly if U.S. corporate or military interests were threatened.

    While Chomsky may find Republican rhetoric reprehensible, actions speak louder than words and, in that sense, the CIA is the loudest of all U.S. institutions.

    Be Sociable, Share!

     

    Print This Story Print This Story
    You Might Also Like  
    ___________________________________________
    This entry was posted in Front Page: National, Inside Stories, National, Top Stories and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
    • sffoghorn

      The CIA incompetent? It is functioning as designed and being used by people who know exactly what they are doing.

    • Helen4Yemen

      NORM: Just to let you know that you did not answer any of my questions below because Palestine is Arab and the Ashkenazi is European who stole that land. Bye!
      ______________

      1) European Jews and Arab Jews have nothing in common except for a common religion. Yes or no?

      2) Is the Ashkenazi European or not? If not, tell me what he is. If he is European, then tell me what the h— he is doing on Arab land. Palestine is not his grandmother’s land, is it?

      3) The snow-white Ashkenazi arrived to LEECH off Arab land as other snow-white Leeches like him were calling it quits and going home. It is amazing how this European LEECH decided to colonize Arab land when other white Europeans like him had given up on its and had gone home? This snow-white Ashkenazi does not belong in Palestine as he is a predatory leeching menace. He is foreigner and will always be a foreigner.

      4) Now tell me how the Ashkenazi is connected to Palestine at ZERO % ancestry? How does one “return” to an area where one has 0% ancestry? Why could you not answer?

      5) Why are these Europeans still leeching off Arab land? What prevents them from going back home to Poland, Russia, Hungary, Germany, France, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Romania, Bosnia, Serbia, Estonia, Austrian, America, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Britain, France …?

      6) The Ashkenazi in Palestine is equivalent to the French in Algeria or the British in India – a predatory leech.

      7) You are such an idiot that you think the Saudis, Yemenis, Iraqis and so on just love to give up their freedom and just would like to be in Palestine so that the snow-white Ashkenazi would abuse them everyday of their lives?

      8) Why are these Europeans still leeching off Arab land? What prevents them from going back home to Poland, Russia, Hungary, Germany, France, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Romania, Bosnia, Serbia, Estonia, Austrian, America, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Britain, France …?

      9) I do not give a damn if a Lithuanian or Russian calls himself “Sabra” or “Cobra”. Palestine is not this white dude’s grandmother’s land, is it ? He is like the rapist that must use force to take. The French colonized Algeria for over 132 years and 1,000,000 French were forced to leave Algeria in 1962 – and the British who colonized Aden, Yemen, for 160 years were forced out by the people of Aden in 1967. Isn’t the Ashkenaz just as European as the British and the French? If foreign people steal land and there are no consequences to their actions, how do you stop others from colonizing other lands and refusing to go home? The Ashkenazi can very safely return home, he chooses not to only because life is comfy there. Remove the American money by the truckloads that gets sent there and you will see these folks heading towards the airports in a matter of hours.

      10) Arab Jews = genetically are Arab European Jews = are genetically European African Jews = genetically African There is no “Jewish race”. “The Jews” are a religious group like Muslims and Christians.

      11) Explain to me how white Europeans who have 0% Middle East DNA but 99.9% European DNA could say they were there 3000 years ago? Did their ME DNA just evaporate?

      12) The Zionist said he was coming back, did he not? You are confusing immigration and colonization. When people immigrate, they live under the rules of the receiving nation. The Arabs in America are no different than the Ashkenazi originally from Eastern Europe but can now be found in US, Canada. The Ashkenazi in Palestine arrived holding a gun on one hand and a flag on the other. The Ashkenazi in Palestine is equivalent to the French in Algeria or the British in India – a predatory leech!

      13) The snow-white Ashkenazi arrived to LEECH off Arab land as other snow-white Leeches like him were calling it quits and going home. It is amazing how this European decided to colonize Arab land when other white Europeans like him had given up on its and had gone home?

      14) This snow-white Ashkenazi does not belong in Palestine as a predatory leeching menace. He is foreign and will always be foreign.

      • Norm

        Take care

    • Helen4Yemen
      • Norm

        You are right. But Duke thinks he can… He’s wrong, of course.

    • tapatio
      • tapatio

        APPARENTLY NEITHER THE JUDEO-NAZl CARTOONIST THAT DREW THE ZIONIST GRAPHIC BELOW OR THE HASBARA TROLL, “Norm”, HAVE ANY CLUE THAT THE UNITED STATES PUT POL POT IN POWER AND THE LATE HO CHI MINH’S VIETNAMESE GOVERNMENT HAD TO ERADICATE POL POT’S KHMER ROUGE AFTER THEY DROVE US OUT OF VIETNAM. IN SPITE OF THEIR BEING THE SELF-“CHOSEN”, JEWS CAN BE AMAZINGLY STUPID.

        • TecumsehUnfaced
          • tapatio

            I am really holding a grudge against him. From the Bushs, Clintons and Drumpf – one expects criminal behavior.

            But, I remember how a dozen of us danced around our living room on election night in 2008, with the delusion that we had FINALLY gotten a real American President again.
            http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Suckers.jpg

            • TecumsehUnfaced

              I didn’t wake up until he started appointing people. It turns out now they were all recommended by Citibank.

              • tapatio

                Yup!!

          • Norm

            I couldn’t agree more. He is a Muslim deified by progressives, you know.

            • TecumsehUnfaced

              Funny how the Jewish banksters all loved him and financed his Presidential campaigns. That seems to confirm how deeply confused you are again.

              You even love Jew killers, like the ZioNazis, who blocked the escape of millions of non-Zionist Jews from Hitler to other countries.

              Sacrificing Europe’s Jews

              The correlative to the acts of collaboration with the Nazis throughout the 1930’s was that when attempts to change the immigration laws of the United States and Western Europe were contemplated in order to provide token refuge for persecuted Jews of Europe, it was the Zionists who actively organized to stop these efforts.

              Ben Gurion informed a meeting of Labor Zionists in Great Britain in 1938: “If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Israel, then I opt for the second alternative.” [84] This obsession with colonizing Palestine and overwhelming the Arabs led the Zionist movement to oppose any rescue of the Jews facing extermination, because the ability to deflect select manpower to Palestine would be impeded. From 1933 to 1935, the WZO turned down two-thirds of all the German Jews who applied for immigration certificates.

              Berel Katznelson, editor of the Labor Zionist Davar, described the “cruel criteria of Zionism”: German Jews were too old to bear children in Palestine, lacked trades for building a Zionist colony, didn’t speak Hebrew and weren’t Zionists. In place of these Jews facing extermination the WZO brought to Palestine 6,000 trained young Zionists from the United States, Britain and other safe countries. Worse than this, the WZO not merely failed to seek any alternative for the Jews facing the Holocaust, the Zionist leadership opposed belligerently all efforts to find refuge for fleeing Jews.

              As late as 1943, while the Jews of Europe were being exterminated in their millions, the US Congress proposed to set up a commission to “study” the problem. Rabbi Stephen Wise, who was the principal American spokesperson for Zionism, came to Washington to testify against the rescue bill because it would divert attention from the colonization of Palestine.

              This is the same Rabbi Wise who, in 1938, in his capacity as leader of the American Jewish Congress, wrote a letter in which he opposed any change in US immigration laws which would enable Jews to find refuge. He stated:

              It may interest you to know that some weeks ago the representatives of all the leading Jewish organizations met in conference … It was decided that no Jewish organization would, at this time, sponsor a bill which would in any way alter the immigration laws.[85].

              https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/hidden/ch06.htm

              • Norm

                Your fabricated myths are contradicted by the simple fact that Israel’s Jewish population actually doubled during its first three years of independence between 1948 and 1951, as soon as the Brits left.

                This massive influx consisted of the hundreds of thousands of debilitated survivors of the Holocaust from Europe, the tens of thousands of detainees in British internment camps in Cyprus, and the entire population of 850,000 Jews deported from all the Arab states with just the clothes on their back after all their property had been confiscated.

                And this while the fledgling sovereign nation experienced its worst economic period with an inevitable melting-pot culture-shock that took decades to heal, and in the midst of an horrendous war forced on it by the armies of seven Arab countries invading it simultaneously from all sides with the express goal of annihilating it.

                • TecumsehUnfaced

                  You always lie. You ZioNazis killed millions of non-Zionist Jews by blocking their escape from Hitler and you assaulted the Arab Jews.

                  Actually, the gradual departure of the Arab Jews from their homes in Arab lands was another machination of the Ben-Gurion by which he planned to fool and terrorize the Arab Jews into Palestine to serve the victorious European Zionist invaders of Palestine as laborers and farmers. It was Ben-Gurion who ordered the Zionist assaults on the Arab Jews.

                  Zionist crimes against the Jews
                  ->http://www.thepeoplesvoice.ORG/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/11/11/zionist-crimes-against-the-jews

                  Zionist terror against the Jews
                  ->http://www.inminds.CO.UK/jews-of-iraq.html

                  False flag of the Lavon affair
                  ->http://whatreallyhappened.COM/WRHARTICLES/lavon.html

                  All planned and ordered by David Ben-Gurion
                  ->https://en.wikipedia.ORG/wiki/One_Million_Plan

                  Thanks for reminding us that the assault of the alien European Zionist Ashkenazi invaders was not just against the people of Palestine but against all the Arab Jews. Thanks for reminding us of the vast evil of the European Zionists in forcing two Million Arab (Jews, Christians, and Muslims) people from their homes.

    • Norm
      • TecumsehUnfaced
        • Norm

          Page taken from an Arab schoolbook you grew up on?

          • TecumsehUnfaced

            Why would you think the Arabs would do such a blatantly accurate description of the truth of the ZioNazi monsters invading them?

            Do a search on “Israeli atrocities against Palestinians”.

            https://duckduckgo.com/?q=israeli+atrocities+against+palestinians&bext=wfa&atb=v54-2&iax=1&ia=images

            • Norm

              To get the entire picture, do a search on: Pallywood.

              • TecumsehUnfaced

                It says that it’s a Hollywood invention by mendacious ZioNazi thugs desperate to hide their multitudinous crimes against humanity, e.g.

                Over 750,000 people (~80%) driven off their ancestral lands
                Over 500 Arab villages and towns BULLDOZED and buried under pine forests

                Drove attacks on over 700,000 Arab Jews to drive them into conquered Palestine

          • tapatio
            • Norm
              • TecumsehUnfaced
                • Norm
                  • TecumsehUnfaced

                    What are this pair of European ZioNazi thugs doing in Palestine?

                    • Norm

                      What are humans doing outside Africa from which the human race once emigrated?

                      Just like “Saddam Hussein al-Tikriti” born in “tikrit iraq” or “Abu Mansoor Al-Amriki” who was born in America, the common family names of “Palestinians” reveal their country of origin:

                      “Masri” OR “al-masri” =from Egypt, Hamas member of Parliament in gaza, Mushir al-Masri (the word “masri” littelery means “the egyption” in arabic!).

                      “Khamis”= from Bahrain “Salem Hanna Khamis”

                      “al-ubayyidi” or “al-Obeidi”= from sudan “al-ubayyid”

                      “al-Faruqi” or “Farooqi”= Mosul iraq

                      “zarqawi” =zarqa (second largest city in jordan)

                      “al-Araj” = Morocco,a member of the Saadi Dynasty “Hussein al-Araj”

                      “al-Lubnani” =the lebanese

                      “al-kumi” or Qumi =persian origin from the city of Qom “Mahmoud al-Kumi”

                      “al-Mughrabi” = the Moroccan (“Maghreb” – meaning “West” in Arabic, and usually referring to North Africa or specifically to Morocco) ,”Dalal Mughrabi”

                      “al-Djazair”=the Algerian

                      “al-Qurashi”=saudi arabia “clan of Quraish”

                      “al-azd” =yemen “Azd tribe”

                      “al-Yamani”= the Yemeni “Issam Al Yamani”

                      “al-Afghani” = the Afghan

                      “al- frangi”= “the westerner” lit “the franks” “Abdullah Franji”

                      “Al-Sidawi” = from “Sidon” lebanon

                      “Al-fayyumi” = from “Faiyum” egypt

                      “al-Hijazi” or “Hijazi” = present-day saudi arabia “Ahlam Higazi, a “Palestinian” artist from Hebron”

                      “al-Hindi” =the Indian “Amin al-Hindi”

                      “al-Tamimi” or “Tamimi” = from the tribe or clan of Banu-Tamim “Azzam Tamimi”

                      “Hamati” = from syria ( HAMA city)

                      “Omayya” = from saudi arabia “Banu Omayya tribe” “Omayya Joha” “palestinian artist” ”

                      “Othman” = turkey

                      “murad” =yemen “murad tribe”

                      “Alawi” = from syria (minority religious group in syria)

                      “Iraqi” =from Iraq.

                      “halabi” =from aleppo syria

                      “Dajani”= from saudi arabia

                      “Mattar” = from YEMEN (the village of BANI Mattar)

                      “al-baghdadi”= from bagdad iraq.

                      “Tarabulsi”= Tarabulus-Tripoli, Lebanon.

                      “Hourani” =Houran Syria.

                      “Zubeidi”= from iraq “Zubeidi tribe” “Zakaria Zubeidi”

                      “al-Husayni” =saudi arabia.

                      “Saudi” =Saudi Arabia.

                      “Metzarwah”=egypt.

                      “Bardawil” =”salah bardawil” HAMAS legislator in gaza,egypt “bardawil lake” area

                      “nashashibi”= syria.

                      “Bushnak” =bosnia

                      “zoabi”= from iraq “Haneen Zoabi”.

                      “Turki” =turkey “Daud Turki”

                      “al-Kurd” = kurdistan.

                      “Haddadins” = YEMEN descended from Ghassanid Christian Arabs.

                      “Arab Abu-Kishk” = Egypt.(Bedouins)

                      “Arab al shakirat” = Egypt (Bedouins)

                      “Arab al zabidat” = Egypt (Bedouins)

                      “Arab al aramsha” = Egypt (Bedouins)

                      “Abu Sitta” =In Arabic’ Abu means father and sitta means six. Translated it actually means father of six. The Abu Sitta family primarily received this name because around the year 1700, a well known knight of the large Al-Tarabeen tribe always had six slaves (i.e. fedawyah, bodyguards), 3 on each side, with him. They were with him wherever he went, day or night. Hence the name “ABU SITTA.” =Egypt (Bedouins) “Salman Abu Sitta ”

                      “Nuba, Hebron” =founded by the “nuba people”

                      Even “Arafat”, the most famous fakestinian and leader of the terrorist grup the  P.L.O, is not native to judea. He called himself a “Palestinian refugee” and claimed he was born in jerusalem ! BUT spoke

                      Arabic with Egyptian dialect. He was born in 1929 Cairo, Egypt. He served in the Egyptian army, studied in the University of Cairo, and lived in Cairo until 1956 !

                      Arafat’s full name was Mohammed Abdel Rahman Abdel Raouf Arafat al-Qudwa al-Husseini.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Doesn’t that emphasize how totally alien to the region the evil European ZioNazi thug invaders were?

                      • Norm

                        Hardly. All humans living today anywhere in the world – with the possible exception of Africa – would be considered “totally alien to the region” by that logic.

                        Jews first immigrated and settled in the region more than 3000 years ago. As can be seen by the above list of family names, Arabs immigrated and settled there afterwards – especially in the early 20th century after the early Zionists came, dried the swamps, and made the desert bloom again.

                        Are you an anti-immigration bigot, by any chance?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Again you are lying. A Semite Jewish presence is not established in Palestine until after the fourth century BCE. There was no presence of Ashkenazi Jews until they started invading for conquest and ethnic cleansing in the late 19th century. That’s not immigration, that’s colonial, imperialist assault.

                        Also, the ZioNazis would have died without the help of the Arabs who didn’t know how evil these invaders were yet.

                        The General’s Son: From Privileged Zionist to Activist for Palestinian Rights – RAI (1/3)

                        On Reality Asserts Itself, Miko Peled tells Paul Jay that his father, a famous Israeli General, was ostracized for saying it was necessary to negotiate with the PLO and respect Palestinian self-determination; but he never gave up his belief that the expulsion of 1948 and creation of a Jewish state was justified

                        Ilan Pappé in one of his books, he mentioned how when the very early settlers came, the very early Jewish settlers came to Palestine in the late 19th century, they couldn’t plant lettuce. They couldn’t plant food. They were dying of malaria. They were sick and the Palestinians, the farmers would come and help them because they were starving and they were sick. In their diaries, those same Jewish settlers were talking about how these aliens, we have to rid our country of these foreign aliens which are the Arabs.

                        So I mean the ideology that the Arabs are the aliens and this land is ours runs very deep.

                        http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17898#pop1

                        ———-

                        Sorry, the evil of you invading ZioNazi thugs is indefensible, no matter how manner lies you yammer out.

                      • Norm

                        Are you against all people whose ancestors came from Europe to settle in other continents, or is it only Zionists that you have issue with?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        That question is wriggling unsuccessfully to get out from under the vast weight of ongoing crime of the ZioNazi thugs.

                        You’ve just admitted that you were lying about the ZioNazi non-existent farming abilities. I bet you haven’t even heard of the Jezreel Valley.

                      • Norm

                        So are you or are you not against all people of European origin who now live in other continents?

                        And do I really need to give you a list comparing Israeli innovations in farming and agriculture in just the last few decades vs. the entire Muslim world in the past 1400 years, or can you search it on your own on DuckDuckGo?

                        “Large-scale Jewish settlement began in September 1921 in the Jezreel Valley. Until the end of the decade, 23 settlements had been established – more than half of the number of Jewish settlements that had been set up in that time period. The first five settlements were built during the last months of 1921. The first one, Nahalal, was founded on September 11th in a fever-stricken area west of the Jezreel Valley. The settlers were warned not to settle in the area because of the malaria, but they did not heed the warning. They rushed to settle the swamp area, dried it, and within a few years the place had became one of the fertile areas of the country.” http://www.zionistarchives.org.il/en/datelist/Pages/Jezreel.aspx

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Zionistarchives? More of the ZioNazi con game to justify an invasion by sick and vicious thugs?

                        Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won
                        Middle East – Tom Suarez on January 1, 2017

                        By the time the Balfour Declaration was finalised, thirty-plus years of Zionist settlement had made clear that the Zionists intended to ethnically cleanse the land for a settler state based on racial superiority; and it was the behind-the-scenes demands of the principal Zionist leaders, notably Chaim Weizmann and Baron Rothschild.

                        First-hand accounts of Zionist settlement in Palestine had already painted a picture of violent racial displacement. I will cite one of the lesser known reports, by Dr. Paul Nathan, a prominent Jewish leader in Berlin, who went to Palestine on behalf of the German Jewish National Relief Association. He was so horrified by what he found that he published a pamphlet in January, 1914, in which he described the Zionist settlers as carrying on

                        a campaign of terror modelled almost on Russian pogrom models.

                        ->http://mondoweiss.NET/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/

                        How are you Ziothugs better than the Nazis? You’re every bit as despicable in your conduct and whine a heck of a lot more.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Note that I answered your silly question already. Wouldn’t anyone of decency be against savage invasions of conquest still ongoing, such as that pursued by the evil ZioNazi thugs in Palestine?

                      • Norm

                        You never answered it.

                        Note that the early Zionists immigrated to a region under the rule of a mighty Muslim empire for hundreds of years. Portraying them as some kind of invading imperialistic colonialists is quite idiotic, don’t you think?

                        And you never clarified your position on the hundreds of millions of people of European origin now living in other continents mostly after actual colonialism, real apartheid, and brutal ethnic cleansing enabled by military superiority. You’re only picking on Jews – who never even had a military before 1948 for the past 2000 years. Why? Your anti-Semitism?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Wow, are you stupid! Just go back and look! I said ongoing. Only a savage ZioNazi thug will try to deflect from their current crimes against humanity with events hundreds of years ago.

                        Invading from Europe to seize the homes of another people is not being imperialistic colonialists? Wow, are you mendacious!

                        Now the genocidal country stealer wants to call me “anti-Semitic” because I disapprove of the savage flood of crimes ongoing by non-Semitic ZioNazi thugs against the Semitic Palestinians. You just love to whine too much. Or are you saying that we should never have condemned the Germans for their concentration camps?

                        Here’s a small recent example of the barbarity of the evil ZioNazi invaders of Palestine.

                        http://www.globalresearch.ca/gazas-territorial-waters-fisherman-mohammed-baker-killed-by-israeli-naval-forces/5590659

                      • Norm

                        You: “I said ongoing.”

                        So what you’re saying here is that you’re quite OK with actual invasions and colonialism by Europeans, as long as the occupier eventually succeeds after a few hundred years in totally subduing the conquered to the point that no detectable resistance is observed? Is that it?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        There you go again mendaciously trying to put words into my mouth.

                        You just demonstrated how despicable you are again. No wonder you’re a ZioNazi dissembling thug!

                        Wisdom is hitting where you can get results against the unconscionable evil. But that would never occur to you, since you are full minion to an ongoing unconscionable evil.

                        Yet thanks for admitting that the evil to which you are dedicated is indefensible by you your cheap, silly tricks.

                      • Norm

                        Are you never going to provide a straight answer to my question above?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        That deflection to a silly question already answered shows that you fully realize that the ZioNazi assault on Palestine and the rest of the Middle East is indefensible monster work. Why do you adhere to such damnable sickness with such ferocity?

                      • Norm

                        You remind me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLdEYw3ginA

                        I asked a simple question. Why are you avoiding answering it?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Who cares what I remind you of?

                        You’ve already admitted that the evil ZioNazi assault on Palestine is indefensible.

                        I enjoy watching you flail in your evil confusion, because I gave the answer to your silly question in subtility beyond the grasp of your dim ZioNazi psychopathy.

                      • Norm

                        No one will ever be able to understand your point of view if you don’t explain it clearly and coherently.

                        Let alone if you obfuscate it intentionally.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        You understand it very well. Everyone of decency despises the conduct of you ZioNazi thug invaders immiserating the Middle East. That’s why you play stupid with silly games.

                        This is what you evilly savage ZioNazi thugs are about.

                        Eyewitness Accounts[Deir Yassin]

                        The eyewitness accounts of these events foreshadowed the fate of the Palestinian people.

                        It was noon when the battle ended and the shooting stopped. Things had become quiet, but the village had not surrendered. The IZL (Irgun) and Lehi (Stern Gang) irregulars left the places in which they had been hiding and started carrying out clean-up operations in the houses. They fired with all the arms they had, and threw explosives into the buildings. They also shot everyone they saw in the houses, including women and children – indeed the commanders made no attempt to check the disgraceful acts of slaughter. I myself and a number of inhabitants begged the commanders to give orders to their men to stop shooting, but our efforts were unsuccessful. In the meantime, some twenty-five men had been brought out of the houses: they were loaded into a freight truck and led in a ‘victory parade,’ like a Roman triumph, through to Mahaneh Yehudah and Zikhron Yosef quarters [of Jerusalem]. At the end of the parade they were taken to a stone quarry between Giv’at Shaul and Deir Yasin and shot in cold blood. The fighters then put the women and children who were still alive on a truck and took them to the Mandelbaum Gate. [54]

                        The director of the International Red Cross in Palestine, Jacques de Reynier, attempted to intervene as word of the slaughter spread. His personal testimony is as follows:

                        … The Commander of the Irgun detachment did not seem willing to receive me. At last he arrived, young, distinguished, and perfectly correct, but there was a peculiar glitter in his eyes, cold and cruel. According to him the Irgun had arrived twenty-four hours earlier and ordered the inhabitants by loudspeaker to evacuate all houses and surrender: the time given to obey the order was a quarter of an hour. Some of these miserable people had come forward and were taken prisoner, to be released later in the direction of the Arab lines. The rest, not having obeyed the order, had met the fate they deserved. But there was no point in exaggerating things, there were only a few dead, and they would be buried as soon as the “clean-up” of the village was over. If I found any bodies, I could take them, but there were certainly no wounded.

                        This account made my blood run cold. I went back to the Jerusalem road and got an ambulance and a truck that I had alerted through the Red Shield … I reached the village with my convoy, and the firing stopped. The gang (Irgun) was wearing uniforms with helmets. All of them were young, some even adolescents, men and women, armed to the teeth: revolvers, machine-guns, hand grenades, and also cutlasses in their hands, most of them still blood-stained. A beautiful young girl with criminal eyes showed me hers, still dripping with blood; she displayed it like a trophy. This was the “clean-up” team, that was obviously performing its task very conscientiously.

                        I tried to go into a house. A dozen soldiers surrounded me, their machine-guns aimed at my body, and their officer forbade me to move. The dead, if any, would be brought to me, he said. I then flew into one of the most towering rages of my life, telling these criminals what I thought of their conduct, threatening them with everything I could think of, and then pushed them aside and went into the house.

                        The first room was dark, everything was in disorder, but there was no one. In the second, amid disembowelled furniture and all sorts of debris, I found some bodies, cold. Here the “clean-up” had been done with machine guns, then hand grenades. It had been finished off with knives, anyone could see that. The same thing in the next room, but as I was about to leave, I heard something like a sigh. I looked everywhere, turned over all the bodies, and eventually found a little foot, still warm. It was a little girl of ten, mutilated by a hand grenade, but still alive … everywhere it was the same horrible sight … there had been four hundred people in this village; about fifty of them had escaped and were still alive. All the rest had been deliberately massacred in cold blood for, as I observed for myself, this gang was admirably disciplined and only acted under orders.
                        After another visit to Deir Yasin I went back to my office where I was visited by two gentlemen, well-dressed in civilian clothes, who had been waiting for me for more than an hour. They were the commander of the Irgun detachment and his aide. They had prepared a paper which they wanted me to sign. It was a statement to the effect that I had been very courteously received by them, and obtained all the facilities I had requested, in the accomplishment of my mission, and thanking them for the help I had received. As I showed signs of hesitation and even started to argue with them, they said that if I valued my life, I had better sign immediately. The only course open to me was to convince them that I did not value my life in the least. [55]

                        https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/hidden/ch04.htm

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        You savage ZioNazi thugs are no refuge for decent Jews. You ZioNazis blocked the escape of millions of Europe’s Jews from Hitler, who was willing to let them go, because he wanted Germany to be Jew free, just like you savage ZioNazi thugs want to make Palestine free of Palestinians. You ZioNazis and Nazis are brothers in evilness of spirit.

                        “Never again”? You ZioNazis are flaming hypocrites. You are doing the same thing to the Palestinians (who you invaded!) that Hitler did to the Jews.
                        Without you savage ZioNazis blocking the escape of the non-Zionist Jews, millions would have escaped the misery of the concentration camps. Would you ZioNazis have been able to construct a Holocaust then?

                        Fighting Asylum

                        The entire Zionist establishment made its position unmistakable in its response to a motion by 227 British members of Parliament calling on the government to provide asylum in British territories for persecuted Jews. The meager undertaking which was prepared was as follows:

                        His Majesty’s Government issued some hundreds of Mauritius and other immigration permits in favor of threatened Jewish families. [86]

                        But even this token measure was opposed by the Zionist leaders. At a Parliamentary meeting on January 27, 1943, when the next steps were being pursued by over one hundred members of Parliament, a spokesperson for the Zionists announced that they opposed this motion because it did not contain preparations for the colonization of Palestine. This was a consistent stance.

                        Chaim Weizmann, the Zionist leader who had arranged the Balfour Declaration and was to become the first president of Israel, made this Zionist policy very explicit:

                        The hopes of Europe’s six million Jews are centered on emigration. I was asked: “Can you bring six million Jews to Palestine?” I replied, “No.” … From the depths of the tragedy I want to save … young people [for Palestine]. The old ones will pass. They will bear their fate or they will not. They are dust, economic and moral dust in a cruel world … Only the branch of the young shall survive. They have to accept it. [87]

                        Yitzhak Gruenbaum, the chairperson of the committee set up by the Zionists, nominally to investigate the condition of European Jews, said:

                        When they come to us with two plans – the rescue of the masses of Jews in Europe or the redemption of the land – I vote, without a second thought, for the redemption of the land. The more said about the slaughter of our people, the greater the minimization of our efforts to strengthen and promote the Hebraisation of the land. If there would be a possibility today of buying packages of food with the money of the Karen Hayesod [United Jewish Appeal] to send it through Lisbon, would we do such a thing? No. And once again no! [88]].
                        https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/hidden/ch06.htm

                      • Norm

                        So, basically, what is so troubling to you is that the 6 million Jews that perished in the Holocaust were not able to flee Germany in time to immigrate to Palestine?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Everything about you ZioNazis and what you do to other people, including Jews, is troubling. If you weren’t a psychopath, you would recognize it.

                        You fling up the lies like a water fountain. Why would the fleeing Jews have to go Palestine to help the ZioNazi thugs rape the Palestinians? Why do you claim 6 million Jews perished, when you ZioNazi thugs have done everything you could to block finding out what really happened? Why do you choose six million, a number that had been around a long time already?

                        SIX MILLION JEWS, HOLOCAUST 1915 1938
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paDxxnBDz7M

                      • Norm

                        You’re not making yourself clear again, which makes it extremely difficult to pinpoint what you’re complaining about. When you say “Everything Zionists do is troubling”, people cannot understand what exactly is your point. Does it include draining the swamps? Making the desert bloom? Maintaining a democracy? Drinking coffee?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Hilarious! Everything you said was a lie. Let’s give them a stomping.

                        Let’s get rid of your Joan Peter’s mythology.

                        DISPUTE FLARES OVER BOOK ON CLAIMS TO PALESTINE
                        By COLIN CAMPBELL
                        Published: November 28, 1985

                        The book is ”From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict over Palestine,” published last year by Harper & Row. The author is Joan Peters, a Chicago writer, and her title is ironic: The thrust of the book’s 601 pages is that the Palestinians did not, despite Arab claims, have deep historical roots in the territory that became Israel after 1948.

                        [snip]

                        Yehoshua Porath, an Israeli historian of the Palestinian Arabs who teaches at Hebrew University, was asked in a telephone interview from Jerusalem about the book. ”I think it’s a sheer forgery,” he replied.

                        ”In Israel, at least, the book was almost universally dismissed as sheer rubbish except maybe as a propaganda weapon,” the historian said. Mr. Porath described his politics as centrist. He has written an essay on the book for The New York Review of Books that will be published soon.

                        http://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/28/books/dispute-flares-over-book-on-claims-to-palestine.html

                        Then get rid of your silly claims that the ZioNazi thugdom is a democracy.

                        Stop living in denial, Israel is an evil state
                        Israel may not be Naz*, nor even a fascist state. Yet it is a member of the same terrible family, the family of evil states. Just consider these acts of evil perpetrated by the state…
                        By Gideon Levy | Jul. 31, 2016 |
                        After we’ve cited nationalism and racism, hatred and contempt for Arab life, the security cult and resistance to the occupation, victimhood and messianism, one more element must be added without which the behavior of the Israeli occupation regime cannot be explained: Evil. Pure evil. Sadistic evil. Evil for its own sake. Sometimes, it’s the only explanation.

                        Eva Illouz described its signs (“Evil now,” Haaretz, July 30). Her essay, which challenges the idea of the banality of evil, considers the national group as the source of the evil. Using philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept, she finds a “family resemblance” between the Israeli occupation and history’s evil regimes. This similarity does not mean that Israel is Naz*, nor even fascist. And yet it is a member of the same terrible family, the family of evil states. It’s a depressing and brilliant analysis.

                        The evil that Illouz attributes to Israel is not banal, it cannot happen anywhere, and it has political and social roots that are deeply embedded in Israeli society. Thus, Illouz joins Zeev Sternhell, who warned in his impressive and resounding essay about the cultural soil out of which fascism is now growing in Israel (“The birth of fascism,” Haaretz Hebrew edition, July 7).

                        But alongside these analyses, we must also present a brief history of evil. We must present the instances that combine to create a great and horrific picture, a picture of Israeli evil in the territories, so as to stand up to those who deny the evil. It is not the case of the individual – Sgt. Elor Azaria, for example, who is being tried for the death of a subdued Palestinian assailant in Hebron – but the conduct of the establishment and the occupation regime that proves the evil. In fact, the continuation of the occupation proves the evil. Illouz, Sternhell and others provide debatable analyses on its origins, but whatever they are, it can no longer be denied.

                        One case is like a thousand witnesses: the case of Bilal Kayed. A young man who completed a prison term of 14.5 years – his entire sentence – without a single furlough, without being allowed to at least say goodbye by phone to his dying father; a clear sign of evil.

                        About six weeks ago, Kayed was getting ready for his release. A representative of the Shin Bet security service – one of the greatest agencies of evil in Israel – even showed him a photograph of the home his family had built for him to stir him up even more ahead of his release. And then, as his family waited impatiently for him at the crossing point and Kayed grew ever more excited in his cell, he was informed that he was being thrown into administrative detention for at least another six months, without trial and without explanation.

                        http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.734309

                      • Norm

                        From your own NYT link, here’s what’s inside your “[snip]”…

                        “Many early reviewers described the book as extraordinarily important. Barbara Tuchman in a comment for the dustjacket called it ”a historical event in itself.” … Others who praised the book include Saul Bellow, Elie Wiesel, Lucy Dawidowicz, Arthur J. Goldberg, Theodore H. White, Paul Cowan and Angier Biddle Duke. Philip M. Hauser, a University of Chicago demographer and former director of the United States Census, recommended the book’s methods. Reviewers for Commentary, The National Review, The Atlantic and other journals described the book’s themes as revelations. Martin Peretz, editor of The New Republic, wrote: ”This book, if read, will change the mind of our generation. If understood, it could also affect the history of the future.” …

                        “Writers who have attacked the book, besides Mr. Chomsky and Mr. Cockburn, include: Edward W. Said, professor of English at Columbia and a member of the Palestine National Council, a political body associated with the P.L.O. …

                        “Mrs. Tuchman, in an angry letter to Sir Ian that was printed last month in The Nation, traced part of the hostility against the book to Britain’s ”growing anti-Semitism.” Mrs. Tuchman said later that she regarded some of the book’s American critics as ”committed P.L.O. supporters” who were guilty of ”the worst kind” of anti-Semitism. …

                        “Mr. Peretz of The New Republic charged that the ”political far left” had attacked Miss Peters to recoup such losses as ”the utter disintegration” of the alliance between Palestinian nationalists and the Arab states. Mrs. Tuchman said she had not kept up with recent scholarship but she retained a vivid sense from research she did 30 years ago that Jewish labor had reclaimed a desolate Palestine, just as Miss Peters argued. The notion of ”the Palestinians” was ”a fairy tale,” Mrs. Tuchman said.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Of course, the ZioNazis doing the early unchecked reviews liked its lies, like the confessed liar, Elie Wiesel, and dreadfully confused Barbara Tuchman. But all the specialized professionals in the field panned Joan Peter’s intentionally deceiving work. That is the point of my excerpt. You dug out that small section describing how the ZioNazis leapt for such obvious nonsense.

                      • Norm

                        It’s only some far-left auto-anti-Semitic Jews and the anti-Semitic PLO members who criticized it, as the NYT makes quite clear in that article.

                        You’ve now lost all credibility, I’m afraid.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        I’ve already refuted your silly claims. Look at the last message.

                        It is actually you who has lost as all credibility (as if you ever had any.)

                      • Norm

                        Your last message is nothing but your repeat of your message just before it, which had already been refuted by your own NYT link, among many other sources.

                        There are numerous written accounts of 19th century and earlier travelers in the Holy Land. They ALL confirm the desolation, ruin, emptiness, and lawlessness of the region at the time. The Arab names of the very few and far between villages they encountered there can all be traced back to obvious mispronunciation of the original biblical Hebrew names.

                        Moreover, there are absolutely no books, news articles, official documents, or any other historical records dating prior to the mid 1960s in any language from any country in the world that mention the existence of an indigenous ethnically-distinct “Palestinian People” in that region! Many major Jewish institutions in the region prior to the founding of Israel, be it banks like the Anglo-Palestine Bank (today’s Bank Leumi), newspapers like the Palestine Post (today’s Jerusalem Post), even official inscriptions on coins and banknotes, all referred to themselves as Palestinian. The UN 1947 Partition Plan doesn’t mention any “Palestinian People”, either. It refers to ALL inhabitants there as Palestinians, distinguishing between Palestinian Jews and Palestinian Arabs where needed, as was customary by Arab themselves at the time. I’ve already provided you with an extensive list of common so-called “Palestinian” family names and their actual origin.

                        I’m afraid history is quite clear on this, with or without Joan Peters’ excellent book.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Funny! You haven’t refuted anything, but supported my claim that only ZioNazis outside the area of expertise like the book. Note that Porath’s scathing evaluation comes after observing that all these flaming ideologues liked the book. So you’re just doing the ZioNazi twist again, and losing badly.

                        You don’t push forward any of these books that claim that Palestine was desolate. Why? You know that they can all easily be refuted by the population data and other writing.

                        Sorry, but your silly claims about there being no Palestinians just because they weren’t called a “Palestinian” people are nonsense. Note also that the invader ZioNazi thugs called themselves “Palestinians” to give themselves a false legitimacy, even though they were just invader European genocidal country stealers.

                        Finally, you demonstrate to all what a fraud you are (again!) by calling Joan Peter’s claimed ‘book’ excellent.

                        The legacy of Joan Peters and ‘From Time Immemorial’
                        Israel/Palestine David Samel on January 17, 2015

                        Noam Chomsky has publicly declared his skepticism that Joan Peters even wrote the book, speculating that it might have been authored by some intelligence agency. That may be true, but I would have guessed that any “intelligence” agency would have written a better book. Still, if you have the stomach, watch this video interview of Peters by Zola Levitt. It is difficult to tell who is more clueless, and in my opinion, anyone who watches Peters’s performance could reasonably question her ability to write a book of this scope, even a lousy one.

                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDilGudtoLk

                        http://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/legacy-peters-immemorial/

                        ———–

                        Go ahead! Watch it! You will be embarrassed (again!). She says the most uneducated and silliest things.

                        Gotcha!

                      • Norm

                        Chomsky’s opinions on Israel and Zionism are well-known, as is the fact that it has mostly to do with his obsessive anti-American hatred and his attacks of everything in the world that is pro-American. Nothing he has to say about this or any other foreign affairs topic can be taken seriously.

                        It was only the British Mandate that began the official designation of all residents under its rule as Palestinians. This also included the residents of Transjordan (today’s Jordan), who never even set foot west of the Jordan River at the time. And I believe even you once posted yourself the demographic data clearly showing the anomalous growth of Arab population in Palestine in the late 19th and early 20th century, which can only be ascribed to their massive immigration influx that is well-known also from other sources.

                        I’ve already provided you in the past many excerpts from 19th century and earlier travel books. Do you need a reminder?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Is it Chomsky’s fault that he is so much more intelligent, more honest, and more informed that a ZioNazi troll like yourself.

                        You even lie about the population data. Here’s one example. Where’s the anomalous growth? Can you provide population data showing your mythic anomalous growth?

                        Year – Muslim — Christian – Jews
                        1851 – 300,000 – 27,000 – 13,000
                        1861 – 325,000 – 31,000 – 13,000
                        1878 – 386,320 – 40,588 – 13,942
                        1879 – 390,597 – 41,331 – 14,197
                        1880 – 394,935 – 41,089 – 14,460
                        1881 – 399,334 – 42,864 – 14,731
                        1882 – 403,795 – 43,659 – 15,011 Ashkenazi arrived
                        1883 – 408,318 – 44,471 – 15,300
                        1884 – 412,906 – 45,302 – 15,599
                        1885 – 417,560 – 46,152 – 15,908
                        1922 – 598,177 – 71,464 – 83,790 British Mandate began
                        1924 – 627,660 – 74,094 – 94,945
                        1926 – 663,613 – 76,764 – 149,500
                        1928 – 695,280 – 79,812 – 151,656
                        1930 – 733,149 – 84,986 – 164,796
                        1932 – 771,174 – 90,624 – 180,793
                        1934 – 807,180 – 99,532 – 253,700
                        1935 – 826,457 – 103,371 – 320,358
                        1936 – 848,342 – 106,474 – 370,483
                        1937 – 875,947 – 109,764 – 386,074

                        Here’s some help!

                        The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948
                        ->http://www.mideastweb.ORG/palpop.htm
                        Palestine Population: During The Ottoman And The British Mandate Periods
                        ->http://www.palestineremembered.COM/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story559.html
                        ->http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.ORG/jsource/History/demograhics.html
                        ->https://en.wikipedia.ORG/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine
                        ->http://palestineisraelpopulation.blogspot.COM/#!
                        1851 – 1948
                        ->http://4.bp.blogspot.COM/-Bamk2j86cNE/UeIXy7xXulI/AAAAAAAAATQ/f4zoap_gIUc/s1600/Screen+Shot+2013-07-14+at+1.20.39+PM.png

                        You may trot out your silly examples as before. The population data crushes them.

                        By the way you still haven’t established the right of European ZioNazi thugs to invade and violently seize Palestine.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Note please:

                        Dr. Porath, one of Israel’s leading demographic historians, called Peters’ book a “forgery… [that] was almost universally dismissed [in Israel] as sheer rubbish except maybe as a propaganda weapon.”(New York Times, Nov.28, 1985)

                        Rabbi Arthur Herzberg, vice-president of the World Jewish Council, agreed: “I think that she’s cooked the statistics…. The scholarship is phony and tendentious. I do not believe that she has read the Arabic sources that she quotes.”(ibid)

                        To again quote Professor Porath: “The precise demographic history of modern Palestine cannot be summed up briefly, but its main features are clear enough and they are very different from the fanciful description Ms. Peters gives….
                        [S]he has apparently searched through documents for any statement to the effect that Arabs entered Palestine. But even if we put together all the cases she cites, one cannot escape the conclusion that most of the growth of the Palestinian Arab community resulted from a process of natural increase.” (“Mrs. Peters’ Palestine” New York Review of Books, 16 January 1986.)

                        ———-

                        Seeing how desperate you are to justify the vast flood of crimes against humanity by the evil ZioNazi thugs, I don’t blame you for reaching frantically for Zionist ideologue pretending to have some scholarship in the area.

                      • Norm

                        Also FYI, Prof. Yehoshua Porath who in the 1980s was a member of the far-leftist anti-Israeli Meretz Party, has long since changed his views and realized his mistakes. He opposed the Oslo accords and in the 1996 elections he participated in the campaign of the Likud party and supported Benjamin Netanyahu for prime minister. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yehoshua_Porath#Political_views

                        Not unlike what happened to another of your heroes, Benny Morris.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        So what if Porath changed his political views. Has he rejected his own scholarship? Has he been threatened and paid off enough for that? But go watch that interview with Joan Peters. She demonstrates all by herself what a confused airhead she is.

                        Benny Morris? He has always been a Zionist, and because of that making silly unsupportable claims that are easily diced up by more honest and accomplished scholars.

                        Benny Morris’s Untenable Denial of the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

                        by Jeremy R. Hammond | Nov 14, 2016

                        Israeli historian Benny Morris denies the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, but his own research shows that this was indeed how Israel came into being.

                        [snip]

                        Indeed, what happened in Palestine in 1948 was not an “alleged” ethnic cleansing, as Benny Morris would have us believe. It is regrettable that he seems to have decided that trying to justify Israel’s legitimacy as a “Jewish state” is more important than presenting the public with an honest historical representation of how Israel came into existence. But far from being “alleged”, the ethnic cleansing of Palestine must today be recognized as an uncontroversial
                        historical fact. That this ethnic cleansing occurred is indeed today very well documented—including in Benny Morris’s own important contributions to the literature on the subject.

                        It is also regrettable that the US mainstream media treat the matter as taboo. This silence must be broken. The means by which the “Jewish state” of Israel came into existence—via the ethnic cleansing of the Arab population of Palestine—must be brought out of the darkness and into the light. Only by doing so will the prospects for peace between Israelis and Palestinians have any chance of coming to fruition.

                        http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.COM/2016/11/14/benny-morriss-untenable-denial-of-the-ethnic-cleansing-of-palestine/

                        Thanks for the laughs and the fun of dicing up your silly prevarications.

                      • Norm

                        Both Porath and Morris have recanted their earlier erroneous research, as soon as they have matured and realized that objective historical truth is too important to be abused and left to unscrupulous manipulators for cheap political gains: https://web.archive.org/web/20050916174937/http://hnn.us/roundup/comments/4479.html

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        If anyone wants to understand the utter evil by which the savage ZioNazi thugdom operates, they need only to look at Zionist history and their plans for the future. For the sake of barbaric invaders of no detectable human conscience, they have always planned to immiserate all the peoples of the Middle East.

                        http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815

                        How are these monsters less evil than the Nazis?

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        The snow-white Ashkenazi arrived to LEECH off Arab land as other snow-white Leeches like him were calling it quits and going home. It is amazing how this European decided to colonize Arab land when other white Europeans like him had given up on its and had gone home?

                        This snow-white Ashkenazi does not belong in Palestine as a predatory leeching menace. He is foreign and will always be foreign.

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Take your farming, your gold, you inventions, your tiles and bricks –

                        JUST GO HOME!

                      • Norm

                        Why don’t you go back to your home in Yemen?

                      • Helen4Yemen
                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Have you thought about rescuing your people in ZioNazi land from their thuggish overlords, like this guy has for America?

                        http://www.globalresearch.ca/americas-reign-of-terror-a-nation-reaps-what-it-sows/5590735

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        The Zionist said he was coming back, did he not? You are confusing immigration and colonization. When people immigrate, they live under the rules of the receiving nation. The Arabs in America are no different than the Ashkenazi originally from Eastern Europe but can now be found in US, Canada. The Ashkenazi in Palestine arrived holding a gun on one hand and a flag on the other. The Ashkenazi in Palestine is equivalent to the French in Algeria or the British in India – a predatory leech!

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        https://i1.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/european-jew.jpeg

                        https://i1.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ashkenazi-dna-96-3.png

                        Explain to me how white Europeans who have 0% Middle East DNA but 99.9% European DNA could say they were there 3000 years ago? Did their ME DNA just evaporate?

                      • Norm

                        Isn’t she hot?

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Yep, a thoroughly pure-bred Ashkenazi at a stunning rate of 99.9% SOLID EUROPEAN!

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        DO YOU LIKE TO DISGRACE YOURSELF AS A HABITUAL LIAR?

                        Palestine population

                        Year – Muslim — Christian – Jews
                        1851 – 300,000 – 27,000 – 13,000
                        1861 – 325,000 – 31,000 – 13,000
                        1878 – 386,320 – 40,588 – 13,942
                        1879 – 390,597 – 41,331 – 14,197
                        1880 – 394,935 – 41,089 – 14,460
                        1881 – 399,334 – 42,864 – 14,731
                        1882 – 403,795 – 43,659 – 15,011
                        1883 – 408,318 – 44,471 – 15,300
                        1884 – 412,906 – 45,302 – 15,599
                        1885 – 417,560 – 46,152 – 15,908
                        1922 – 598,177 – 71,464 – 83,790
                        1924 – 627,660 – 74,094 – 94,945
                        1926 – 663,613 – 76,764 – 149,500
                        1928 – 695,280 – 79,812 – 151,656
                        1930 – 733,149 – 84,986 – 164,796
                        1932 – 771,174 – 90,624 – 180,793
                        1934 – 807,180 – 99,532 – 253,700
                        1935 – 826,457 – 103,371 – 320,358
                        1936 – 848,342 – 106,474 – 370,483
                        1937 – 875,947 – 109,764 – 386,074

                      • Norm

                        Year Muslims growth years per year % of pop
                        1851 300,000
                        1861 325,000 25,000 10 2500 0.77%
                        1878 386,320 61,320 17 3607 0.93%
                        1879 390,597 4,277 1 4277 1.09%
                        1880 394,935 4,338 1 4338 1.10%
                        1881 399,334 4,399 1 4399 1.10%
                        1882 403,795 4,461 1 4461 1.10%
                        1883 408,318 4,523 1 4523 1.11%
                        1884 412,906 4,588 1 4588 1.11%
                        1885 417,560 4,654 1 4654 1.11%
                        1922 598,177 180,617 37 4882 0.82%
                        1924 627,660 29,483 2 14742 2.35%
                        1926 663,613 35,953 2 17977 2.71%
                        1928 695,280 31,667 2 15834 2.28%
                        1930 733,149 37,869 2 18935 2.58%
                        1932 771,174 38,025 2 19013 2.47%
                        1934 807,180 36,006 2 18003 2.23%
                        1935 826,457 19,277 1 19277 2.33%
                        1936 848,342 21,885 1 21885 2.58%
                        1937 875,947 27,605 1 27605 3.15%

                      • Norm

                        Yearly population increase as % of population:
                        (your raw data…)

                        Year___Muslims____growth__years__per-year___%-of-pop
                        1851___300000
                        1861___325000____25000____10_____2500______0.77%
                        1878___386320____61320____17_____3607______0.93%
                        1879___390597_____4277_____1_____4277______1.09%
                        1880___394935_____4338_____1_____4338______1.10%
                        1881___399334_____4399_____1_____4399______1.10%
                        1882___403795_____4461_____1_____4461______1.10%
                        1883___408318_____4523_____1_____4523______1.11%
                        1884___412906_____4588_____1_____4588______1.11%
                        1885___417560_____4654_____1_____4654______1.11%
                        1922___598177___180617____37_____4882______0.82%
                        1924___627660____29483_____2____14742______2.35%
                        1926___663613____35953_____2____17977______2.71%
                        1928___695280____31667_____2____15834______2.28%
                        1930___733149____37869_____2____18935______2.58%
                        1932___771174____38025_____2____19013______2.47%
                        1934___807180____36006_____2____18003______2.23%
                        1935___826457____19277_____1____19277______2.33%
                        1936___848342____21885_____1____21885______2.58%
                        1937___875947____27605_____1____27605______3.15%

                        Yearly % of pop increase more than tripled by turn of century, quadrupled by 1937.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Poor Norm. He never realized that population was increasing all over the
                        world like this because of better sanitation. That comes from being a
                        rabid ideologue belonging to a murderous cult, like the ZioNazis.

                      • Norm

                        “We should add that above-average population growth of the Arab villages around the city of Jerusalem, with its Jewish majority, continued until the end of the Mandatory period. This must have been due – as elsewhere in Palestine under similar conditions – to in-migrants attracted by economic opportunities, and to the beneficial effect of improved health services in reducing mortality – just as happened in other parts of Palestine around cities with a large Jewish population sector.”
                        https://books.google.com/books?id=sdYUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33&dq=&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        The ZioNazi thugs chose to steal and live in the best places. So what? The evil ZioNazi thugs were still bent on genocidal country stealing and driving a people out of there homes, just like their brothers in evil spirit, the German Nazis.

                        Oh yes! You still haven’t explained how you are any better than the German Nazis, who also planned to drive a whole people out.

                      • Norm

                        You: “The ZioNazi thugs chose to steal and live in the best places.”

                        Reality:

                        “Large-scale Jewish settlement began in September 1921 in the Jezreel Valley. Until the end of the decade, 23 settlements had been established – more than half of the number of Jewish settlements that had been set up in that time period. The first five settlements were built during the last months of 1921. The first one, Nahalal, was founded on September 11th in a fever-stricken area west of the Jezreel Valley. The settlers were warned not to settle in the area because of the malaria, but they did not heed the warning. They rushed to settle the swamp area, dried it, and within a few years the place had became one of the fertile areas of the country.” http://www.zionistarchives.org.il/en/datelist/Pages/Jezreel.aspx

                        Thus improving living conditions for ALL residents and opening up unprecedented economic opportunities for the massive influx of Arabs from neighboring countries, WHILE also improving health services and reducing their mortality.

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Next time, we will hear the rapist telling his rape victim that

                        he did what he had to do for her benefit. Right? Same as Zionist

                        logic, right? What if the Arabs choose to live in poverty MINUS

                        snow-white-Ashkenazi on their land? Do they have that choice?

                      • Norm

                        You mean like currently in Syria, Yemen, Libya, and Somalia?

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        WHY IS IT THE BUSINESS OF THE WHITE MAN WHO IS NOW COLONIZING ARAB LAND? You have agreed that the Ashkenazi is totally European, have you not?

                      • Norm

                        If you were to ask the land itself whether it’s ‘Arab’, I don’t think it would reply ‘Yes’… Do you?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        Sorry, lies out of the archives of ZioNazi prevarications don’t count.

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        WHY IS IT THE BUSINESS OF HUNGARIAN, LITHUANIAN, RUSSIAN, GERMAN JEWS?

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        DO YOU LIKE TO DISGRACE YOURSELF AS A HABITUAL LIAR?

                        By the time the stampede had begun by European Jewry to Palestine in 1882, Jewish land ownership was less than 0.1% of Palestine. By 1947, all that the Europeans managed to buy was 6.6% of Palestine and the rest they stole.

                        Jewish land ownership in Palestine of total area of 26,323,000 dunums

                        1882 …….. 22,500 …… 0.1%
                        1900 ……. 218,000 …… 0.8%
                        1914 ……. 418,000 …… 1.6%
                        1927 ……. 865,000 …… 3.2%
                        1936 ….. 1,231,000 ……. 4.7%
                        1945 ….. 1,588,365 ……. 6.%
                        1947 ….. 1,734,000 ……. 6.6%

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Look at the map that traces the ancestry of Kushner. Do you see the map of the Middle East? It is totally left blank because DNA analysis found no trace of Middle East ancestry – zero! But you can see Africa highlighted because they found a tiny <0.1% ancestry and Asia too is highlighted as they were able to trace ancestry at 0.1%. But 0% to the Middle East. Now tell me how the Ashkenazi is connected to Palestine at ZERO % ancestry? How does one “return” to an area where one has 0% ancestry?

                        https://www-tc.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/files/2014/11/KushnerDNA.jpg

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        https://i0.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/3×3-arab-eur-afro-jews.jpeg?ssl=1&w=450

                        Arab Jews = genetically are Arab
                        European Jews = are genetically European
                        African Jews = genetically African

                        There is no “Jewish race”. “The Jews” are a religious group like Muslims and Christians.

                      • Norm

                        I believe even tapatio would disagree with you on that…

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        You are such an idiot that you think the Saudis, Yemenis, Iraqis and so on just love to give up their freedom and just would like to be in Palestine so that the snow-white Ashkenazi would abuse me everyday of their lives?

                      • Norm
                      • Helen4Yemen

                        Who then are the natives? Chomsky?

                      • Norm

                        “In 2008, of Israel’s 7.3 million people, 75.6 percent were Jews of any background. Among them, 70.3 percent were Sabras (born in Israeli), mostly second- or third-generation Israelis.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel#Jews

                        This was eight years ago. Today the number of native Israeli Jews is much higher, of course.

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        How are they native? Does the land give off radiation that mutates them into Palestinians from savage invaders?

                      • Helen4Yemen

                        I do not give a damn if a Lithuanian or Russian calls himself “Sabra” or “Cobra”. Palestine is not this white dude’s grandmother’s land, is it ? He is like the rapist that must use force to take. The French colonized Algeria for over 132 years and 1,000,000 French were forced to leave Algeria in 1962 – and the British who colonized Aden, Yemen, for 160 years were forced out by the people of Aden in 1967. Isn’t the Ashkenaz just as European as the British and the French? If foreign people steal land and there are no consequences to their actions, how do you stop others from colonizing other lands and refusing to go home? The Ashkenazi can very safely return home, he chooses not to only because life is comfy there. Remove the American money by the truckloads that gets sent there and you will see these folks heading towards the airports in a matter of hours.

                      • Helen4Yemen
                      • Helen4Yemen

                        I asked you:

                        f) Now tell me how the Ashkenazi is connected to Palestine at ZERO % ancestry? How does one “return” to an area where one has 0% ancestry?

                        Why could you not answer?

                      • Helen4Yemen
                      • Helen4Yemen

                        https://i0.wp.com/worldpeace365.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/3-idf-101-c1.jpg

                        Why are these Europeans still leeching off Arab land? What prevents them from going back home to Poland, Russia, Hungary, Germany, France, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Romania, Bosnia, Serbia, Estonia, Austrian, America, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Britain, France …?

                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        So what? He’s just a politician talking. That talk doesn’t negate the long millennia of genetic history of the Palestinians living in Palestine

                      • Helen4Yemen
                      • TecumsehUnfaced

                        That may be the best photo of Olmert that I’ve seen. It shows what is really behind that customarily beaming exterior.

                  • TecumsehUnfaced

                    We already know that the professionally mendacious MOSSAD employs very bad artists to do their disinformation.

              • TecumsehUnfaced
              • TecumsehUnfaced
              • TecumsehUnfaced
              • TecumsehUnfaced
              • TecumsehUnfaced

                Poor, dumb Norman doesn’t know that’s the way the Americans used to salute the flag.

      • tapatio

        APPARENTLY NEITHER THE JUDEO-NAZl CARTOONIST THAT DREW THE ZIONIST GRAPHIC ABOVE OR THE HASBARA TROLL, “Norm”, HAVE ANY CLUE THAT THE UNITED STATES PUT POL POT IN POWER AND THE LATE HO CHI MINH’S VIETNAMESE GOVERNMENT HAD TO ERADICATE POL POT’S KHMER ROUGE AFTER THEY DROVE US OUT OF VIETNAM. IN SPITE OF THEIR BEING THE SELF-“CHOSEN”, JEWS CAN BE AMAZINGLY STUPID.

        • Norm

          Much like yourself, the anti-American anti-Christian self-loathing Jew Chomsky has supported each and every anti-American anti-Christian anti-Semitic despot in history for the sole reason that they’re anti-American anti-Christian anti-Semitic.

          But even Chomsky hasn’t condoned the eradication all Jews off the face of the earth that you propose. You still need to explain how your views are different than Hitler’s, if at all. https://disqus.com/home/discussion/mintpressnews/el_daily_stormer_neo_nazi_website_rolls_out_spanish_edition/#comment-3311405110

          • TecumsehUnfaced

            How do you know what Hitler’s views are? Did you get them Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin who wanted to fight for him?

            • Norm

              So now you’re denying the Holocaust which you’ve just used earlier on this thread to lie about Zionism? Did you forget to read your obligatory daily chapter of Mein Kampf today?

              Well, FYI, Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin looked for ways to transfer all Jews out of Nazi-occupied Europe and bring them safely to Palestine. I’m sure you’d consider this a lofty enough goal in light of your earlier fabricated myths.

              • TecumsehUnfaced

                Why do despicable slime jobs love yammer accusations of Holocaust denial all the time? Without even defining what they claim is being denied? Or giving any support to it?

                “Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin looked for ways to transfer all Jews
                out of Nazi-occupied Europe and bring them safely to Palestine.”

                Again you are lying. They were good buddies with the Nazis.

                Medallion that Geobbels struck to commemorate Nazi-Zionist cooperation
                http://northshorenumismaticsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/NaziPalestina.jpg

                Troops of the Betar in Uniform Berlin 1936
                http://oi53.tinypic.com/snlx5k.jpg

                Embracing the SS

                Consequently, the Zionists brought Baron Von Mildenstein of the SS Security Service to Palestine for a six-month visit in support of Zionism. This visit led to a twelve-part report by Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, in Der Angriff (The Assault) in 1934 praising Zionism. Goebbels ordered a medallion struck with the Swastika on one side, and on the other, the Zionist Star of David. In May 1935, Reinhardt Heydrich, the chief of the SS Security Service, wrote an article in which he separated Jews into “two categories.” The Jews he favored were the Zionists: “Our good wishes together with our official good will go with them.“ [82] In 1937, the Labor “socialist” Zionist militia, the Haganah (founded by Jabotinsky) sent an agent (Feivel Polkes) to Berlin offering to spy for the SS Security Service in exchange for the release of Jewish wealth for Zionist colonization. Adolf Eichmann was invited to Palestine as the guest of the Haganah.

                Feivel Polkes informed Eichmann:

                Jewish nationalist circles were very pleased with the radical German policy, since the strength of the Jewish population in Palestine would be so far increased thereby that in the foreseeable future the Jews could reckon upon numerical superiority over the Arabs. [83]

                The list of acts of Zionist collaboration with the Nazis goes on and on. What can account for this incredible willingness of Zionist leaders to betray the Jews of Europe? The entire rationale for the state of Israel offered by its apologists has been that it was intended to be the refuge of Jews facing persecution.

                The Zionists, to the contrary, saw any effort to rescue Europe’s Jews not as the fulfilment of their political purpose but as a threat to their entire movement. If Europe’s Jews were saved, they would wish to go elsewhere and the rescue operation would have nothing to do with the Zionist project of conquering Palestine.

                https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/document/mideast/hidden/ch06.htm