Number Of U.S. Police Officers Charged With Murder Or Manslaughter For On-Duty Shootings Tripled in 2015

Experts say a higher abundance of video evidence may be the cause.
By |
Be Sociable, Share!
    • Google+
    Screenshot from the by-stander's video footage which shows Officer Michael Scott in the process of shooting a fleeing Walter Scott in the back.

    Screenshot from the by-stander’s video footage which shows Officer Michael Scott in the process of shooting a fleeing Walter Scott in the back.

    CHICAGO  — The number of U.S. police officers charged with murder or manslaughter for on-duty shootings has tripled this year – a sharp increase that at least one expert says could be the result of more video evidence.

    In the past, the annual average was fewer than five officers charged. In the final weeks of 2015, that number has climbed to 15, with 10 of the cases involving video.

    “If you take the cases with the video away, you are left with what we would expect to see over the past 10 years – about five cases,” said Philip Stinson, the Bowling Green State University criminologist who compiled the statistics from across the nation. “You have to wonder if there would have been charges if there wasn’t video evidence.”

    The importance of video was highlighted last week with the release of footage showing a Chicago officer fatally shooting a teenager 16 times. The officer said he feared for his life from the teen, who was suspected of damaging cars using a small knife. He also had a powerful hallucinogen in his bloodstream.

    “This had all the trappings of a life-threatening situation for a law-enforcement officer – PCP-laced juvenile who had been wreaking havoc on cars with a knife,” said Joseph Tacopina, a prominent New York defense attorney and former prosecutor who has represented several police officers. “Except you have the video that shows a straight-out execution.”

    When he was charged with first-degree murder last week, officer Jason Van Dyke became the 15th officer in the country to face such charges in 2015.

    Over the last decade, law-enforcement agencies have recorded roughly 1,000 fatal shootings each year by on-duty police. An average of fewer than five each year resulted in murder or manslaughter charges against officers, Stinson found.

    The cases are often difficult to prove. Of the 47 officers charged from the beginning of 2005 through the end of last year, about 23 percent were convicted, Stinson found.

    “For forever, police have owned the narrative of what happened between any encounter between a police officer and a civilian,” said David A. Harris, a University of Pittsburgh law professor who has written extensively on police misconduct. “What video does is it takes that power of the narrative away from the police to some extent. And that shift in power of control over the narrative is incredibly significant.”

    In case after case, that is exactly what has happened this year.

    Stinson said Van Dyke would “never, ever” have been charged without the video. He said the same is true for Ray Tensing, the white University of Cincinnati police officer who is charged with murder and voluntary manslaughter in the July 19 death of Samuel DuBose, a black motorist whom Tensing shot to death after pulling him over for a missing front license plate.

    Tensing’s attorney said the officer feared he would be dragged under the car as Dubose tried to drive away. But, Stinson said, the video from the officer’s body camera shows that his explanation “doesn’t add up.”

    Other cases around the country also reveal just how important the video is.

    In Marksville, Louisiana, for example, two deputy city marshals were charged with second-degree murder after authorities reviewed video from one of the officers’ body cameras, which showed a man with his hands in the air inside a vehicle when the marshals opened fire. The man was severely wounded and his 6-year-old autistic son killed.

    Just how dramatically a video can shift the balance of power was apparent in North Charleston, South Carolina, when officer Michael Slager shot and killed Walter Scott, an unarmed black man as he ran away after a traffic stop.

    Slager told investigators that Scott had tried to grab his gun and Taser. But after a video from a cellphone showed Slager taking careful aim at Scott as he ran away and then picking up his Taser and dropping it near Scott’s body, Slager was charged with murder.

    “If not for the recording, I have no doubt that the officer in the Walter Scott case would be out on patrol today,” Harris said.

    Videos have also played a key role in cases in which the victims were, in fact, armed – something that Tacopina said typically brings to a halt any thought of charging officers.

    Chicago prosecutors concluded that McDonald did not pose a threat to Van Dyke, despite the small knife that he was carrying.

    Likewise, prosecutors in Albuquerque, New Mexico, charged two officers with second-degree murder of a mentally ill homeless man who was holding two knives when he was shot to death. Defense attorneys have said the officers shot James Boyd out of concern for their lives, but Boyd appears to be turning away from the officers when the shots were fired.

    In another case, an officer may owe her freedom to the camera that was attached to her stun gun.

    Lisa Mearkle, a police officer in Hummelstown, Pennsylvania, was charged with third-degree murder, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter after shooting an unarmed man twice in the back as he laid face-down in the snow. But after watching a video that showed the man’s hands repeatedly disappear under his body as Mearkle shouted at him to keep his hands where she could see them, the jury acquitted Mearkle.


    Be Sociable, Share!

    Stories published in our Hot Topics section are chosen based on the interest of our readers. They are republished from a number of sources, and are not produced by MintPress News. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Mint Press News editorial policy.


    Print This Story Print This Story
    You Might Also Like  
    This entry was posted in Daily Digest, National and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
    • tempest411 .

      This is so stupid. How much more are we to tie the hands of law enforcement? If a suspect is running away from a police officer, of course he should shoot him!

    • GALT

      It is possible to say that 2 + 2 = 4 in base 10 with any degree
      of CERTAINTY….or must we “pretend” that there is some DOUBT
      involved to appear to BE reasonable? To rely on “faith” in the face
      of “evidence” regarding “anything” is the very definition of being
      “UNREASONABLE”…….when we are confronted with the “fact”
      that those who are “unreasonable” will manufacture “evidence”
      to attempt to support that which is “unreasonable” in order to
      appear “reasonable”……we face what can clearly be defined as
      EVIL in the secular use of that term.

      There is no “MAYBE” involved here…….this is EVIL of the highest
      order…….to take life, to deny the means of sustaining life, of a fellow
      human being without reasonable cause……is the highest form of evil
      in a secular world, and since we have no evidence of any other kind
      of world or universe… be “reasonable” is to state this clearly and
      without equivocation or doubt.

      To express that “Without god all things are permitted.” ignores the
      evidence that ” With god all things are nor only PERMITTED, they
      are often REQUIRED.”